Richard Dawkins, in trying to backtrack on his heartless kill Down Syndrome babies comment, has only dug his grave a little deeper. He wrote: If your morality is based, as mine is, on a desire to increase the sum of happiness and reduce suffering, the decision to deliberately give birth to a Downes baby, when you have the choice to abort it early in the pregnancy, might actually be immoral from the point of view of the childs own welfare. And therein is the difference between the godly and this godless world. Their chief end is happiness, while the chief end of those who love God is righteousness. Dawkins wants to increase the sum of happiness through murder of the helpless unborn. Thats the usual motive for murder. The killer is made happy once the victim he wanted to kill is dead. Nazi Germany made Hitler happy. The attack on New York made terrorists happy. Rape makes the rapist happy. Human happiness should always be subservient to righteousness. The slaughter of the unborn is a violation of the Sixth Commandment, and those who violate its perfect precepts will answer to God, whether they believe in Him or not. --Ray Comfort.
Posted on: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:16:59 +0000