Rights to Travel Explained Oct 14 City of Toledo Ore City Councilyoutube/watch?v=oViHbFGzD_o&feature=youtu.be Rights to Travel Explained Oct 14 City of Toledo Ore City Council image Rights to Travel Explained Oct 14 City of Toledo Ore Cit... View on youtube Preview by Yahoo edward- malone; johnston II Lawful Write-In Campaign for Election for the De Jour Mayor Position of the... Toledo Oregon territory I, edward-malone: johnston II, a man and lawful American National, am running for many of reason besides the fact that it is just plain and simple time for these offices to be given back to the men, women and children of this town. Also to bring awareness and education for the future, our youth, of this community and surrounding territory. My campaign will consist of four topics starting with the most important (honor) my oath, (life) water, (life) food (liberty) the right to travel without be impend. (see Right to Travel ruling by U.S.S.C.) My Oath of office will be taken, by one in a lawful position to administer it, and Recorded, as required by law, to preserve authentic evidence of...without the required recorded Oath there is no office. This is an honorable position to be able to serve the people of the territory and in return I will honor my Oath of Office! I will encourage all those receiving checks from either city, county, or state Treasuries; to honor their Oaths and follow the law to record those Oaths, or there is no authentic evidence of it ever being done accordingly. The water in this town will NEVER have fluoride, poison, so long as I live here, but also it will NEVER be shut off to the lawful men, women and children/inhabitants no matter what. Who is anyone to deprive one of Life? The food: there is 400 acres that belong to the people of Toledo (located right outside of Toledo towards Harland, passed the Mill) and nothing is being done with this land. I want to open it up to the residents of Toledo to give them the opportunity to grow their own organic food and we will use the resources Toledo already has to accomplish it. I believe it will provide the youth, our future, a great opportunity to get involved to learn and help others along to build order and discipline in a healthy way that they can be proud of. This campaign is one of many I would like to see more residence get involved in. Many know me, around the area, and I deeply care about you and your children or I would not be interested in getting so involved. My believe in the Constitution for the United States of America and the structures founded therein goes without saying nor explanation. I want to see the men, women and children fully flourish as it is your investment(s) into our government(s), and our employees, to ensure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity. There are many topics that need to be addressed that can and will be as I will open both discussions and ideas, brain storming our problems to solve them, for positive change. You after all are the greatest. I ask for your vote on election day. Thank you all very much. For more lawful information please contact me at 541-336-1233. Write-In Your Vote edward-malone; johnston II for De Jour Mayor of Oregon Territory . Hello Ed, This email is to confirm our recent telephone conversation. You have requested to present a video on the Lawful rights to travel at the next Toledo City Council meeting on October 14,2014. City Manager Baughman has agreed to allow the video to be presented during the visitors/public comment section of the agenda for said meeting. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:15pm. Please arrive by 6:10 to make sure that your video is set up and ready for your presentation. https://youtube/watch?v=L1WW4PwNV5w Sincerely, Nancy Bryant City Recorder City of Toledo PO Box 220 Toledo, Or. 97391 Phone: (541) 336-2247 x2110 Fax: (541) 336-3512 PUBLIC RECORDS LAW DISCLOSURE: This e-mail is subject to the State Records Retention Schedule and may be made available to the public. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended solely for the use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable state and federal laws. If you are not the addressee, or are not authorized to receive information for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, distribute, or disclose to anyone this message or the information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply email and expunge this message. Thank you. Hi Nancy Arresting a Corrupt Lawyer/Bureaucrat Arresting a Corrupt Lawyer/Bureaucrat image Arresting a Corrupt Lawyer/Bureaucrat View on youtube Preview by Yahoo The state government did not create the common law, so it has no authority to abolish it or control it, unless we allow ourselves to be tricked to putting common law under statutory law, where its their house, their rules. However, if we operate outside the statutory rules by invoking common law, no state government has the authority or jurisdiction to dictate, control or abolish what we do. They only have authority to enforce our decisions. What I have now noticed and what needs be done to make our once employees, now, AKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba, CORPORATION de facto government in touch with... reality: Furthermore I have noticed these signs of possible metal conditions which exist by not only the Corporation but their employees as well; Passive aggressive person: 1) shy away from letting you know they are angry; 2) silent treatment, negligence, inefficiency or stubbornness; 3) avoidance 4) pushing away which indirectly affects other person(s); 5)acting out by forgetting on a chronic level; 6) forgets job tasks;, events, meetings, 7) does not complete work; 8) knowingly does not complete work so others have to re do it or complete it; 8) chronic lies, 9)makes weak or lame excuses; 10) makes jokes of the situation; 11) continue to do harm to their constituents. It is time for examination Federal Law also prohibits Cities and Counties from issuing citations against businesses, see Title 18 U.S.C.891-896, quoting Section 891 An extortionate means is any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property. No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce themFederal Law also prohibits Cities and Counties from issuing citations against businesses, see Title 18 U.S.C.891-896, quoting Section 891 An extortionate means is any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property. No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property...and is regarded as UNALIENABLE. 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers.” (Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S. E. 2nd. 247.) Palazzolo v. Rhode Island | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent … Palazzolo v. Rhode Island | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law Legislature passed motor vehicle laws regulating drivers for hire and has never expanded them beyond that subject class, per Dexter Johnsons own statement. Yet police routinely enforce the Vehicle Code against nonbusiness automobile users. Eighteen Sheriffs have explicitly said so. The reason for the mis-enforcement is that the police are relying on the ORS, which does not reflect the legislative intent that only business vehicles are to be regulated. The result is a sort of extortion, whereby millions of dollars are being collected wrongfully from Oregon citizens. In addition, road upkeep costs are being shifted from trucking companies onto the general public. This mis-enforcement can be stopped easily, if Legislative Counsel Dexter Johnson revises the Oregon Vehicle Code to clarify that it is a business regulation applicable only to vehicles used for compensation or profit. Restore Republican Form of Government to Oregon -------------------------------- Instead of enforcing the laws passed by the Legislature, Oregon police enforce the O.R.S. written by Legislative Counsel Dexter Johnson and earlier occupants of that office. Any mismatch between the Acts and the O.R.S. constitutes a failure to have a Republican Form of Government, in which the Peoples representatives write the laws that are enforced. Make good on the promise of the Constitution: The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government[.] (Article IV, Clause 4) Please see video for more information and details, https://youtube/watch?v=L1WW4PwNV5w Carl Miller - Right to travel without a license pl https://youtube/watch?v=cV8gRA-JYeg The CAFR Swindle - The Biggest Game In Town youtube/watch?v=1pRPBKJQnyU posted by Edward Johnston,, anti-fraud activities, rating, or underwriting, 18 U.S.C. 2721(b)(6); to notify owners of towed or impounded vehicles, 18 U.S.C. 2721(b)(7); by licensed private investigative agencies or security services for permitted purposes, 18 U.S.C. 2721(b)(8); for use by employers to verify information relating to a holder of a commercial driver’s license, 18 U.S.C. 2721(b)(9) (1994 & Supp. III 1997); and for use in connection with private tollways, 18 U.S.C. 2721(b)(10). In addition, personal information in motor vehicle re- cords may be disclosed in certain circumstances for bulk distribution for surveys, marketing, or solicitation, but only if individuals are provided an opportunity, in a clear and conspicuous manner, to block such use of information pertaining to them. 18 U.S.C. 2721(b)(12). Thus, disclosure of motor vehicle information about an individual for direct-marketing purposes is prohibited unless (a) the individual is provided the opportunity, under Section 2721(b)(11), to block general disclosure of his personal information, and declines that opportunity, or (b) the individual is given the opportunity to block use of his personal information for direct marketing specifically, and declines that opportunity. 4 b. The DPPA also regulates the resale and redis- closure of motor vehicle information by private persons who have obtained that information from a DMV. See 18 U.S.C. 2721(c) (1994 & Supp. III 1997). The DPPA’s restrictions on resale and redisclosure by private 4 The DPPA also provides that personal information in motor vehicle records “shall be disclosed” for certain specific purposes pursuant to other federal statutes. 18 U.S.C. 2721(b) (1994 & Supp. III 1997). As we explain below (pp. 28-29 n.12, infra ), that provision does not impose any new disclosure requirements, but rather makes clear that the DPPA does not bar disclosures other- wise required by federal law. State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities. Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991). I have a right to question and challenge any Publicly owned taxing activities by Any Public court, their Elected and public employee government,,non-for profits and any affiliates agency as to their validity and legal standing: Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of limitations upon his authority. The United States Supreme Court, Federal Crop Ins. Corp, v. Merrill, 332 US 380-388 L1947) The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. United States Supreme Court reminds us in Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906): The legal right of an individual to decrease or ALTOGETHER AVOID his/her taxes by means which the law permits cannot be doubted --Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 peace and god bless Jesus oregontrackers Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven.” (Jagens v. Lavine, 415 S.Ct.768). “Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, even on final determination.” (Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 2nd 906 at 910). Eds unlawful hearing and arrest again 10132014... Eds unlawful hearing and arrest again 10132014 image Eds unlawful hearing and arrest again 10132014 View on youtube Preview by Yahoo Supreme courts ruled Without Corpus delicti there can be no crime “In every prosecution for crime it is necessary to establish the “corpus delecti”, i.e., the body or elements of the crime.” People v. Lopez, 62 Ca.Rptr. 47, 254 C.A.2d 185. •In every criminal trial, the prosecution must prove the corpus delecti, or the body of the crime itself-i.e., the fact of injury, loss or harm, and the existence of a criminal agency as its cause. People v. Sapp, 73 P.3d 433, 467 (Cal. 2003) [quoting People v. Alvarez, (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1161, 1168-1169, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 903, 46 P.3d 372.]. As a general principal, standing to invoke the judicial process requires an actual justiciable controversy as to which the complainant has a real interest in the ultimate adjudication because he or she has either suffered or is about to suffer an injury. People v. Superior Court, 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 793. 131.025¹ Attorneys and Devil contractors Parties in criminal action Except for offenses based on municipal or county ordinances, in a criminal action the State of Oregon is the plaintiff and the person prosecuted is the defendant. [1973 c.836 §3] AKA Lawful American 1860 lawful owners of the Birth certificate stock bonds .. All government officials and agencies, including all State legislatures, are bound by the Constitution and Shall NOT create any defacto 1871 1933 banking act laws which counter the Constitution: The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1895, ruled unconstitutional a federal law... containing unlawful income taxes, senate and house Bills ones birth certificate , statutes and codes with arguments are not laws concerning class warfare and the definition of a direct tax. Herein...Ohios Doctrine of Governmental Immunity was held unconstitutional and others to numerous to mention. (Civil Rights) (Krause vs Ohio, app 2d 1 L.N.W. 2d 321 1971.) Reich vs State Highway Dept. 336, Mich 617: 194 N.W. 2d 700 197Employees of a city or state are not immune from suit under statute relating civil rights for deprivations of rights on ground that officials were acting within the scope of their ground that officials were acting within the Scope of their responsibilities of performing a discretionary act. (Bunch vs Barnett 376 F.Sup. 23.)Title 28 Section 1391, this section makes it possible to bring actions against government officials and agencies in district court outside D.C. (Civil Rights) (Norton vs Mcshane 14 L.Ed. 2d 274.)A suit in detinue or replevin in personam should lie to gain possession of property seized by the state. (Civil Rights) Stephen, Pleading (3rd Am ed) p. 47, 52, 69, 74; Ames Lectures on legal history, p. 64, 71; Wilkins v. Despard, 5 Term Rep- 112; Roberts v. Withered, % Mod. 193, 12 Mod. 92. Honorable elected and public servants title 5 2906-3331 ors 131.125¹ Janet Reno Right To Travel Brief 98-1464.pdf https://dropbox/s/rr8hpylpu3wro1v/Janet%20Reno%20Right%20To%20Travel%20Brief%2098-1464.pdf https://dropbox/s/rr8hpylpu3wro1v/Janet%20Reno%20Right%20To%20Travel%20Brief%2098-1464.pdf use your pass port or birth papers U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse- drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing anothers rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business. -Thompson vs. Smith, supra; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784,,, By oregontrackers
Posted on: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:27:32 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015