SACRAMENTO FEDERAL COURT JUDGES WHO BLOCKED LITIGATION AGAINST FAMILY COURT CORRUPTION NOW CAUGHT IN MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST – FRAUD ON THE COURT SCANDAL US District Court judges in Sacramento, California who for years have impeded, obstructed, and dismissed federal civil rights litigation against corrupt family court judges, court employees and administrators, and judge pro tem divorce attorneys are now caught up in a massive fraud on the court scandal. The Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Observer, Fox News and Sacramento Bee have all published reports on the startling accusations against federal judges and prosecutors in the Eastern District of California. The judge and prosecutor misconduct scandal has engulfed the entire bench in Sacramento Federal Court, and resulted in the conflict of interest disqualification of every judge on the court. Sacramento Family Court reform advocates have posted documents and news stories about the debacle at the ISSUU page linked below. The scandal stems from the Sierra Pacific Moonlight Fire case and alleges egregious, systemic government misconduct. Most judges at the EDCA are former state or federal prosecutors, state court judges, or both, and reportedly convey a pro-government, pro-law enforcement bias in the adjudication of federal civil rights cases against law enforcement officers, government employees, prison officials, state court judges, and government officials. EDCA judges routinely do not disclose conflicts of interest as required by law. Similar to the Moonlight Fire federal case, Sacramento Superior Court whistleblowers assert that Sacramento Federal Court judges individually and collectively are responsible for the concealment of systemic civil rights violations, honest services fraud, and RICO racketeering by Sacramento Family Court state court judges and judge pro tem attorneys against indigent, financially disadvantaged and disabled pro per litigants. Virtually all judges at the Eastern District of California have work history, or professional, social, or personal relationships with Sacramento Superior Court judges, administrators, temporary judges, and attorneys with the SCBA Family Law Section. Sacramento Federal Court Judges Morrison England, John Mendez, and Troy Nunley are former Sacramento Superior Court state judges. EDCA judges do not disclose these conflicts of interest and the court does not require a Notice of Interested Parties – used to assess potential conflicts – when a civil case is filed. For example, Los Angeles Federal Court (CDCA) Local Rule 7.1-1 requires filing a Notice of Interested parties when a civil case is initiated, and the court provides a local form (CV-30) for filing the notice. The notice enables “the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal,” according to Local Rule 7.1-1. Sacramento Federal Court has no formal process for identifying conflicts of interest, and makes no attempt to do so. Sacramento court reform advocates charge and have documented that, for over 10 years, the EDCA has obstructed, impeded, and dismissed federal civil rights litigation against the RICO enterprise conspirators. Virtually all Sacramento Federal Court judges have undisclosed work history, or professional, social or personal relationships with many of the enterprise members. The scale and scope of the corruption rivals that of the Kids for Cash scandal in Luzerne County, PA. issuu/judicia…/…/20397aed97fa4052aee16475cdf42f99
Posted on: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 08:47:08 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015