SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9062 of 2013 S.NO. Name of the Petitioner Advocate On Record 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 PANDYA DHYEY J KALARIYA GAURAV P BARAD DINESH K AHIR DHARMENDRA K PITHIYA SAGAR N MEGHNATHI HIMANSHU N VALA MANOJ B KUBAVAT RAJDEEP V KARIA DARSHAN R SIDHAPURA VIVEK B SISODIYA MAYUR M MUNDIYA HIREN B MENIYA JAYESH G PAWARA CHIRAG L AMRITIYA SUDHIR VARIYA HIREN BHALIYA BHARGAV B JAIN ASHU A KEJARIVAL MOHIT P GUPTA CHANDRAPARKASH SABUWALA SHABBIR K SHAH NIKET D PANCHMATIA ANKIT P CHANGADIYA KEVAL H SHARMA SHITANSHUSHEKHAR M PANCHAL SANJAY M PATEL PRAGNESH L PATEL ANKIT N PATEL HIREN D PATEL RUSHI H PATEL BRIJ S PATEL CHIRAG K MODH BRIJESH V JOSHI BHARGAV V PRADHAN PRASHANT M GHANCHI PRIYANK I NIMBARK BIRJU D BARAD BHAUMIK B BHADJA PRATIK D DHANDHUKIYA RAJDEEP J KARATHIYA MIHIR J TADHA DINESH DHINOJ NIRAV A PAREKH BINDIYA C OZA HARSH J PATEL NEEL D SHUKLA DHAIWAT M KEDIA NOOPUR R SHAH URVISH K VANAAR SHKTISINH V JOSHI SACHI A JOSHIPURA DHVANI R DHAMECHA NIDHI P MODI VIJAL D KOSHTI SAMEEP H MODI AKSHESH P LEUVA MEET A DOCTOR SHACHISH P KHANDEKAR ARCHAN A PATEL NIRAV R DALAL SHAIVAL S IYENGAR SHREYA P SOLANKI HIRAL J SHAH KESHAVI N PATEL JUHI A SHAH KAKSHA B PATHAK NIRAMYA J SHAH AASHKA A THAKKAR MITA J SUTHAR RAGHAV K SHUKLA SACHI S VAISHNAV ANKIT J PATEL JAYDEEP A PADIA ANKITA B BHATT DHAVAL S DAMANI SAURABH S PRAJAPATI BHAUMIK B PANCHAL PRADIP R PANCHAL JAY A PARMAR KINJAL H PANCHAL MALAV A PATEL KRUNAL G ASARI DHARMESH L PRAJAPATI AJAYKUMAR S ANAND NIRAV B GOHIL BHAVESH P PATEL JAYESH B PRAJAPATI SUMEGH N SAINI MEGHRAJ K SHRIMALI KAPIL Y PARMAR MAHESH P RAVJANI NAUSHAD B LADUMOR MAHESH MAVANI PRATIK J NIMAVAT KANDARP P MODI NISHIT P PATEL ROHAN K TAPAN VARLEKARFor the reasons stated above, the petitions, being Special Civil Application Nos.9639 of 2013 and 9018 of 2013 are dismissed. Special Civil Application Nos.9583 of 2013 and 9062 of 2013 are partly allowed. State of Gujarat as also the Gujarat University are Page 42 of 44 42 of 44 SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/9018/2013 04/07/2013 09:56:05 AM C/SCA/9018/2013 JUDGMENT directed to follow the statutory Rules of the Gujarat University, especially Rule 4.1 providing for preferences to be given to the students of the Gujarat University for admission in PG Medical Courses while operating the NEET based State list for the purpose of giving admission in the first year PG Medical Courses for the academic year 2013-2014. Since the petitioners of Special Civil Application Nos.9583 of 2013 and 9062 of 2013, who are from the Gujarat University, have already filled in forms, the same shall be relied for the purpose of giving admissions to the First Year PG Medical Courses in the Gujarat University. However, for streamlining the procedure by the State of Gujarat for admission into PG Medical Courses, if any form/ application is required to be filled in, the petitioners shall comply with such requirement. 39. The State as also the Gujarat University both are directed to commence the requisite procedure for the purpose of admissions to PG Medical Courses in the State of Gujarat based on NEET merit list so as to strictly adhere to the time schedule provided by MCI. In order to see that there is no delay on the part of the State authorities or the concerned University for admission to PG Medical Courses, the State as also the Gujarat University both are directed to commence such procedure by 2nd July 2013. It is made clear that if the State fails to commence such procedure for the purpose of admission to PG Medical Courses based on NEET merit list, the Gujarat University is directed to immediately commence such procedure by following its statutory Rules based on NEET merit list so as to strictly adhere to the time schedule provided by the MCI. Rule is discharged qua Special Civil Application Nos.9639 of 2013 and 9018 of 2013 and Rule is made absolute to the extent above qua Special Civil Application Nos.9583 of 2013 and 9062 of 2013. 40. At this stage, learned advocate Mr. Majmudar appearing for the respondents- students requests to stay this judgment and order. Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court has already upheld the validity of Page 43 of 44 43 of 44 SPECIAL CIVIL
Posted on: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 05:03:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015