Saw this on Bill Frisbee. Got me thinking. Do you think they meant it how it came out, or did they mean to say something else? Here is my take: and mind you I can be totally wrong. I think they are trying to say you dont have the right to take a life just because they are TRYING to take yours or someone elses life. he person is not a murderer until they actually commit the crime. So if you stop them from killing, then the crime falls on your shoulders. These people relate the thought to something along the lines of You cant arrest someone before they commit the crime. Basically they are advocates for non-lethal force. Now, I am not agreeing with them. I actually totally disagree with them. But, like always, I feel the need to look into the whats, hows, and whys of people thinking process. What say you?
Posted on: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 02:50:42 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015