Senthil Perumal asked whether there is any proof that the Sarkaria Commission report mentioned MK as master of Scientific Corruption. I thought yeah may be lets see whats there in the report. Well getting an exact copy of the report is not possible today, as noted by blogger Ramasamy (othisaivu.wordpress/2011/05/10/post-29/). In the document that i could access, i dont see Sarkaria calling MK as master Scientific corruption explicitly, may be it is just a reference he made outside this report, or phrase coined by MKs Rivals. But he observes the following: It has been established that Shri. Karunanidhi, abusing his official position as Chief Minister, actuated with the motive to unduly favour Sathyanarayana Brothers..... There is no doubt that Shri. Karunanidhi was interested in the contract being given to Sathyanarayana Bros. for some extraneous consideration. In this connection two circumstances have been firmly established: 1. Purushothamans friendship with Maran and his exploiting this friendship to influence Karunanidhi and through him, Hussain; 2. The supply of materials worth about Rs. 59,202 by Purushothaman for construction of `Murasoli building without accepting payment - a fact admitted by Maran himself. ``Public money to the extent of nearly Rs. 6 crores was squandered over this project To the public exchequer, it would mean an additional burden of several crores and to the public looking long for adequate water supply, a tortuous wait for at least two years more. The responsibility for this huge waste of public money must rest squarely on Shri Karunanidhi and Shri Sadiq Pasha The only online version of the Sarkaria commission report (edited, does not has the full prelim report or any appendix details) is in a book in Google Book store, as noted in this Blog. books.google/books/about/Committees_and_Commissions_in_India_1947.html?id=xm75_y1xWs4C MK is innocent the same Way as : MKA is innocent of T.Krishnan case MKA is is innocent of Dinakaran newspaper case JJ is innocent of Tansi case Rajiv is innocent of Bofors case A Raja is innocent of 2G case Mannumohan is innocent of Coalgate Because none were convicted. Ending the post with a transaction as observed by Sarkaria report. Read it thoroughly and you will Laugh you *** off. By the way, Mrs Dharma mentioned in this below transaction is now known as Rajathi Ammal. On Jan 20, 1969, Mrs. Dharma purchased the house No 9, 1st Cross Street, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai from one Mrs. E L Viswasam for Rs. 57,000. On August 21, 1970, Dharma sold the same house to T.K. Kapali (her security guard) as shown by Document no 1523/70. In this document, the registrar notes that the buyer T.K. Kapali paid the seller Rajathi @ Dharma Rs. 14,000 in his presence. On the same day, Dharma prepared an unregistered lease document in the name of T.K. Kapali. According to this, the same house was leased to Dharma on a monthly rent of Rs. 300 (in other words, she stays on rent in a house she has sold). On Jan 30,1972, Kapali sells this same house to one Mrs. Sivabhagyam for Rs. 45,000 (he sells it at a loss of Rs. 12,000). Sivabhagyam happens to be Dharmas mother! There is a registered document for this sale. On March 20, 1972, Sivabhagyam writes out a settlement deed making over the same house to her daughter Dharma and grand daughter Kanimozhi. This deed indicated that the property would go to them after her (Sivabhagyams) death. In her IT returns filed on March 13, 1973, Dharma claimed that she had borrowed Rs. 40,000 from Kapali to purchase the house. She had also put in Rs. 23,000 which was from her own savings (Rs. 40,000+ Rs. 23,000 = Rs. 63,000. But the registered purchase value was only Rs. 57,000). This borrowing is supported by an unregistered document dated January 11, 1970. According to this document, the borrowed amount was to be returned in 3 instalments of Rs. 15,000, Rs. 15,000 and Rs. 10,000. If this did not happen, the house was to be sold to the said Kapali. A Promissory Note also was prepared to this effect and signed by Dharma on August 21, 1970. Kapali later wrote in the Promissory Note that he had received back Rs. 40,000 from Dharma. This pro-note was later seized by the IT authorities on March 23, 1976. In the IT returns filed by Kapali on April 11, 1973, Kapali indicated that he borrowed Rs. 20,000 as loan from Sivabhagyam in order to pay Rs. 40,000 to Dharma...(in other words, the security guard borrows money from Rajathis mother to lend money to Rajathi!!)
Posted on: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 03:44:11 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015