So, it seems David Cameron believes we may be on the brink of another financial crash... Pretty surprised The Guardian gave David Cameron a chance to voice his opinion after his government (oops, I mean Her Majestys government) forced them to destroy hard-drives with Edward Snowdens data on and detained Glenn Greenwalds partner David Miranda: theguardian/commentisfree/2013/aug/19/david-miranda-schedule7-danger-reporters Not to worry though, as it seems The Guardian have done their research; like many of those in the upper echelons of the government (and society) David Cameron has his vast wealth hidden away from the public eye in offshore tax havens: theguardian/politics/2012/apr/20/cameron-family-tax-havens More on that in a moment. George Osborne has also piped in to support the Prime ministers claims, could it be they have insider information from their old buddy from the Bullingdon Club, global financier and member of the worlds most powerful banking family, Nat Rothschild? (Could go into some dodgy business involving some of Rothschilds other close acquaintances Peter Mandelson and Jeffery Epstein, also well known to President Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, Duke of York, but will leave that for another day) It appears the last financial crash was to some extent engineered by the financial industry, as shown in the Oscar winning documentary Inside Job, narrated by Matt Damon: https://youtube/watch?v=FzrBurlJUNk It got me to thinking, WHO IS REALLY PULLING THE STRINGS? After all, since the last financial crisis of 2008/09, the number of billionaires in the world has doubled: independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/number-of-global-billionaires-has-doubled-since-the-financial-crisis-9826345.html Such a shift of wealth puts more pressure on the majority; you and I, as the general increase in cost of living bears little resemblance to manipulated figures suggesting economic recovery. So a few questions: 1) Given the national debt of the UK is in excess of £1000 billion and continues to increase: a) To whom is this debt owed; I dont just mean the institutions, but who actually owns them, which families and which individuals? b) Given the short tenure of elected officials, and the long term nature of such vast debt, do the institutions and persons in question have leverage and power over the elected governments? (Is this power merely financial, or is there other means by which they manipulate individuals and institutions?) 2) Given the influence of The British Monarchy: a) Since the Queen presides over the commonwealth, many of the nations of which are apparently tax havens (such as amongst others Cayman Islands and Jersey) whether directly or indirectly, does the Monarchy/Crown benefit in any way? b) How many nations and territories does the The Royal Mint provide currency to? c) Given HM Treasury presides over The Royal Mint, what influence does the mints production of international currency have on: i) The UK economy ii) The portfolio of the British Monarchy iii) The portfolio of the Crown d) Given allegations surrounding the conduct of Jimmy Savile and perhaps Edward Heath on Jersey, how many people (in which offices and positions) preside over both the UK Home Office and the Crown dependency of Jersey? (over which the Queen is the ultimate authority) e) Why it was a journalist investigating Jersey was detained at Heathrow in a similar manner to David Miranda in 2011, whilst Jimmy Savile was still alive?: huffingtonpost/leah-mcgrath-goodman/david-miranda-uk-detention_b_3844480.html f) Could it have anything to do with Operation Rectangle, investigating child abuse on Jersey in 2008, whilst Jimmy Savile, who was a close friend of members of the British Monarchy and high government officials was still alive?
Posted on: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:09:16 +0000