So the article aside, one thing Ive noticed in our frequent - TopicsExpress



          

So the article aside, one thing Ive noticed in our frequent debates with the revisionists has been a position in which the revisionists will say Were for revolution too! But we need to do X, Y, and Z first to get there. But were revolutionary!. One then points out the myriad of documents from the YCL or the CPC which argue for a parliamentary path to socialism, and then we still get the but were revolutionary! response. The author of this article interviewed the editor of the CPCs newspaper for a counter-point, and this was the response: Kimball Cariou, editor of the communist newspaper People’s Voice, says the memorial is offensive to people across Canada who identify as socialists but reject violence. “Why is it that this particular group gets to erect this particular monument?” he said in a phone interview from Vancouver. “Because they’re in with the group in power.” So what is it? Are the revisionists revolutionary or not? Because at this point somebody is being lied to; either its the masses, or other communists.
Posted on: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 21:00:46 +0000

Trending Topics



e="margin-left:0px; min-height:30px;"> THE ORIGIN OF SUNDAY WORSHIP THE TEACHINGS OF BISHOP DAVID
A supa special for today - Sari SIlk Twist - An absolutely
TRUE HEART TOUCHING INCIDENT! This girl in the picture is
Buy Yakima SprocketRocket Top Mount Upright Bike Roof Rack -

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015