THINGS OF ORIGIN : ARTICLE 1 There is no big bang BLACK - TopicsExpress



          

THINGS OF ORIGIN : ARTICLE 1 There is no big bang BLACK HOLES what is thing with some ppl that they want to blow up things for which they dont know the answers what is the point in an universe, existing as a big ball at first and blow it up so that it expands forever ..and as it expands it has to contract and go to initial state and this is where we can attach and define different physical properties as entropy and blah blah etc.... absurd nonsense ..it seems to me ...if i think as a lame person without any knowledge of science .. this is the way i would question as a seven year old kid ...if i had known nothing.....these are not statements but basic questions we need to ask in that way ,...i mean ....what is the point of blindly assuming a point and building up everything from that point .. if there is no other way and if we are in illusions...then we can do it ...but for experts ...who want to question the basics of origins that would not be the way to question or answer or assume about things.... but how who do we know what is right or wrong and whether we are in illusion or not and how do we define an illusion BLACK HOLES black holes are of many types and they are not naturally formed all these things exist bcoz of higher dimensions one of the concepts of black holes is simple suppose are is a inclined tunnel and a train needs to go from point a to point b , there is a friction of air....and suppose we remove the air and fill it with vacuum , then and the train travels at enormous speeds incomparable to those speeds it traveled in air... similarly the space we see ,however vast and free it may appear is made up of some medium though many say it is not made up of any medium suppose there is water in a vessel and then u make a hole or tunnel of air through it then an object needs less efforts and faces much less friction and travels much faster.... and same is the case with air and vacuum and now same will be the case with vacuum or so called space medium ...and when emptiness is created the space seems to be a denser medium and ..now thing here is space earth fire water and wind ..all these are five elements and they are not supposed or meant to attract each other ..otherwise everything would merge into one and it implies we all people also would merge into one ...which was ( let us assume ) our actual state...so why we are differentiated and why these separate five elements only and not 10 elements in this particular universe...etc etc questions need to be answered ..ponder over them... how does it appear that a whole galaxy visibly looks smaller as a small disk on the surface of a black hole..? how does black hole itself accommodate a cluster of galaxies into such a small sphere why does it assume the form of 3D sphere...of course sphere is the perfect shape for complete balance on all sides and if so then why is universe egg shaped and who and why they created in such a way is it possible that a small black hole of radius 100km if shrink-ed into a Black Hole of radius 10m ..forces of attraction i.e in this case what we refer to as gravity become so enormous that is start pulling everything near it ..into it and so going by that assumption should not the whole universe get attracted to the black hole and space and time anomalies deformations take place and everything should then just collide as single point and that huge force concentrated at a single point becomes so enormous ...that it may result in a big bang ....OR ALL THESE questions ABSURD..? how does a cluster of galaxies so large get attracted so a small black hole of radius 1000km and if so isnt there a space constraint here on the surface of the 3D SPHERE of the black hole...remember here by our assumptions again ..we are saying that space and time can be twisted as we like... it is just that in this 3D world of universe....we are only a small part of a galaxy , that we dont even have control of ourselves let alone controlling one of the five elements.... is the appearance of the small galactic visions of the surface of the black hole , an illusion or are they just an image which leads to altogether another explanations which i really want to dwell into and all the fuss i am talking about black holes here refer to only 3% of the total concept and 3% of the total variety of black holes and is it true that i am leading into more confusions to get out of actual bigger confusions..YES!!! so in a black hole nothing exists ...none of the five elements exist... so this is where it becomes interesting ..where nothing is there ..it attracts something into it ... is this true or false.. why is there force of attraction or opposite..... on some surfaces little drops of water ...attract each other to form a large drop of water what is this force of attraction... what is this fundamental force of attraction that attracts and exists in many forms like gravity , love , electronic force and various types of forces ....how and why is that basic fundamental force created or came into existence did anyone from higher dimensions created it ..if so why??? if not how did it automatically come into existence how are then black holes automatically created only at certain points ...or as someone say from remains of STARS.. so does that mean this solar system will also become a black hole after all these interactive forces subdue ... force.. what force and how does that force come into picture and who and why created it or how did it come into existence ..is the question any enthusiast in science or astronomy or physics needs to ask in general but nowadays ...people only do give names to already existing phenomena and call it physics ...it is pathetic we only are giving a name to already existing phenomena and not questioning why and how that phenomena came into existence and that is where are science failed for eons.... only vedas can answer these questions..... but an interesting thing is black hole does not contain anything ...so on basis of regular physics and in terms of scientists we can assume it attracts something from its surrounding as it has nothing..absurd or justifiable property...u decide but this is just an assumption ..right or wrong who knows..i may be misleading you... so black hole is made up of nothing ..absolutely nothing ..in such enormous manner that it attracts with such huge force everything around it BUT IT DOESNOT BECOME ONE OF IT..meaning is black hole doesnt become another medium after attracting everything around it ...so all the space and properties of time attached to that space T(S) get attracted to that black hole so that mysteriously ...all the solid seeming space ,which we assumed,contracts and wraps itself as a cover to the black hole and if we somehow enter into that black hole and if it is powerful enough we can in an instant..travel from point A in one universe to point B in another universe...with any time at all because time is a property of space and space doesnt exist in black hole ..so time does not too... in a perfect black hole..no properties exist in a black hole... TIME AND SPACE... if there are illusion of far and near distance in a space and if that has to be essentially the property of space... that is if we go far ..then objects get smaller or appear smaller due the electric pulses sent from brain into our eyes ( which is again a property itself and why is it that way) ...then it is obvious that , time is another property attached to the space ..which varies at different points in space... ...time is actually a property of space... so we say here space vaguely and considering it as a medium in my assumption...here we are trying to teach the way of thinking....not talking about facts or what is right or what is wrong... so space can bended or gets bended or in other words gets attracted to nothing ,when nothing exists at a point in space ( somehow we have to assume someone placed that nothing called here a black hole into something called space ) or we can assume it is there already from the beginning of time...that nothing is something... for nothing to be nothing ...it has to be nothing irrespective of whether something gets attracted and attached to it or not.... and as it always remains nothing irrespective of anything around it ...so much of importance is given to it.. this is how sometimes Upanishads describe things.... and as i mentioned in above sentence....and every sentence in veda has a profound meaning like this...that can explain infinite number of things and their Properties in different ways just that we cannot understand them doesnot mean they are absurd...
Posted on: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 06:16:16 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015