TO: THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT STATE REPRESENTATIVE OMERIA SCOTT THE LAUREL LEADER CALL THE CHRONICLE AND THE REST OF THE SLANDERS OF MY NAME People are going around Laurel slandering my name. Several citizens have told me that I was lying on Judge Breland Hilburn. That I did not submitt valid laws and that no judge would sit and here laws and not respond. People, I submitted three claims in my 2013 Election Contest. (1) That I was denied the right to copy the Voter Roll and Sign-in Sheet, using a call from the attorney generals office and a 1997 Attorney Generals Opinion. The violation of this law prevented me from investigating voter fraud. (2) Violation of MSC 23-15-481, (3) That one voter who worked within our election process voted from a abandon home, and (4) several citizens that did not live in laurel that voted in the 2009 election voted in the 2013 election. Now I would never lie on a judge. As you can see by the documents that are presented to you here. MSC 23-15-545 included within Attorney General Opinion 94-066 permitted the coping of the Voter Rolls which was public domain. Why was I given a 1997 Opinion when they had the 1994 opinion that specially dealt with my claims. Maybe its because I was telling the truth. My rights were being violated. Next, I claimed that pursuant to MSC 23-15-481 public notice of the time and place of testing of the paper ballot machine was to be given at least forty-eight (48) hours prior of tabulation in a local newspaper. A pre-audit group of ballots were to be punched and or marked as to record the candidates name. There wer no notices in the newspapers and I was denied my rights as a candidate to witness the tabulation of the voting machine. The Defendants then tried to slip in a late filing to give the judge the illusion that the DRE machine replaced the OMR (Optical Marking Recorder). After reading through this 19 page filing, I told the judge that MSC 23-15-531 placed another duty on the clerk. Pursuant to MSC 23-15-531, all memory cards to be used in the runoff shall be tested. Public notice ofthe time and place of the test shall be made at least (5) days prior thereto. If the Defense opened the door, I had the right to use it. So no people it is the other way around, I proved my case and the evidence is included in the file. These orders that are being passed from judge to judge when dealing with citizens as pro se are fixed. The evidence is hidden in the file and silent from the Orders. This was not and has it never been a frivolous claim.
Posted on: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 01:48:14 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015