The Correctories of ROME It is my belief based upon hard evidence that Scripture and most ancient manuscripts succumbed to the early form of alterations, of which much later in the thirteen century was called the “Correctories” of Rome. During the 300 years between the sacrifice of the Mashiak and the Council of Nicea, 321-325 B.C, a type of “correctors” were hired to change or “alter” the verses of the Scripture, as well as all the historical manuscripts, to bring harmony between paganism, Scripture,and the calendar of events of the death, and resurrection of the Mashiak. Even the name of the Mashiak was replaced with that of a false Aloah(god) so that all of“Christendom” would worship Rome’s new aloah, a aloah of their own creation. This is just a small sampling of the evidence. All of these historical writings defining the facts of the Council of Nicea have been translated into English and other languages more than 100 years ago to provide for a continued reformation. In the year 325 A.D. was perpetrated one of the most colossal frauds and deceptions in the annals of history. This was the date of the Council of Nicea, whose task it was to create a new religion that would be acceptable to Emperor Constantine... The Historical Apollonius Versus the Mythical Jesus,” By: Dr. R. W. Bernard, Ph.D. “Constantine’s intention at Nicea was to create an entirely new god for his empire who would unite all religious factions under one deity. Presbyters were asked to debate and decide who their god would be. Delegates argued among themselves, expressing personal motive for inclusion of particular writings that promoted the finer traits of their own special deity. Throughout the meeting, howling factions were immersed in heated debates, and the names of 53 gods were tabled for discussion. “As of yet, no god had been selected by the council, and so they balloted in order to determine that matter. . . For one year and five months the balloting lasted. . .” (God’s Book of Eskra, Prof. S.L. MacGuire’s translation, Salisbury, 1922, chapter xlviii, paragraphs 36, 41). “At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity, but had balloted down to a short list of five prospects: Caesar, Crishna [Krishna], Mithra, Horus, and Zeus.” (Historia Ecclesiastica, Eusebius, c. 325). “Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them. To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the Druid god, “Hesus,” be joined with the Eastern Saviour god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus “Hesus Krishna” [Jesus Christ] would be the official name of the New Roman god. A vote was taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities become one God. Following long-standing heathen custom, Constantine used the official gathering and the Roman apotheosis decree to legally defy two deities as one, and did so by democratic consent. A new god was proclaimed and “officially” ratified by Constantine.” (Acta Concilii Nicaeni, 1618). In order to make the previously despised cult of the Early Christians acceptable to Constantine, emperor of Rome - the new (pagan) Church Fathers had to remove from its teachings certain doctrines which they knew were objectionable to Constantine. To accomplish this, certain correctors were hired, whose task it was to rewrite the Gospels. - Apollonius the Nazarene Part 1: The Historical Apollonius Versus the Mythical Jesus By: Dr. R. W. Bernard, Ph.D. The Council of Nicea was a pivotal event in the history of Christianity [those who worship Zeus Christna]. The sudden adoption of a quasiphilosophic term to define the historic Jesus as equal to God [the Father] was a major departure from Scripture and tradition. Further, the use of this term trinity in a Creed meant that, from A.D.325 on, Nicenes could and did proclaim other dogmas that have no basis in Scripture. - State Church of the Roman Empire; Ben H. Swett; 1998 Make no mistake, damage to the original documents have long since been done at the time of the Council of Nicea (A.D. 325), and then again in the thirteenth century. I believe some of these changes were covertly accomplished with the aide of, and in league with top Semitic scholars of the day. Their motivation may have come from the need to remove themselves as far from the time-centric incriminating evidence of the astro-luni-solar calendar that perpetually exposed their guilt of murdering the Mashiak. Perhaps their motivation was born of pride and a need to unite all their followers under one banner of their own devising. This may be why there are so many contradictions that have kept Scriptural believers in hours of debate and confusion. After all these years, it is difficult to say for sure which portions were altered and which were not. There are some insertions that most scholars recognize as being false that came through Romes corruptive influence on the Scriptures. The prophet Daniel warned that this would happen (Daniel 7:25), declaring that the “beast power” would seek to change the very “times and laws” of YaHuWaH. Great care has indeed been given by Rome to ensure consistency among falsified manuscripts. We can therefore have confidence that ALL historical and Scriptural documents have been processed through the “Correctories,” organized for the purpose of changing,YaHuWaH’s times and laws. Unequivocally, we must know that ALL Seminaries of all worship places have known about these FACTS for a minimum of 100 years, yet are refusing to educate their patrons. If you continue to attend a worship place that teaches the Mashiak of Scripture is the same entity as Jesus Christ, then you are in a false worship place, praying to a fabricated Aloah(god). Has the gravity of this sunk in? Does this matter to you?
Posted on: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 23:35:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015