The Evidence for Evolution comes down to 3 kinds Stuff Creationists Dont Understand, Stuff that Creationists will lie about and misrepresent and Stuff that Creationist just refuse to accept. So, which sort does anyone want to discuss first ? Creationists evidence can likewise be sorted into three big piles , usually 1) The stuff they lie about and misrepresent. (Its just a theory) 2) Science stuff they genuinely dont understand ( eg - the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics ) 3) Unsupported claims ( Like Genesis chapter 1 - 10, for instance) So, can any Creationist come up with something that doesnt fit any of these ?
Posted on: Mon, 05 May 2014 20:17:35 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015