The absurdity of the WTC was nuked hoax An excellent refutation of the WTC was nuked claims was provided by Dr. Steven E. Jones, entitled Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers. He summarized a few key points as: Observation of tritium (an important component of hydrogen-bomb fuel) at WTC sites at the few nano-curie level only. This is strong evidence against the mini-nuke hypothesis. The fact that radioactive iodine concentrations were actually lower in the upper/WTC debris-filled layers. Radioactive hot-spots in NYC were found to be due to radium, which is traceable to industrial uses (not bombs). This in itself does not rule out mini-nukes, but these data certainly do not support the mini-nuke hypothesis. Lioy et al. report that radioactivity from thorium, uranium, actinium series and other radionuclides is at or near the background level for WTC dust. Nuclear activation or residual fall-out radioactivity (above background) was NOT observed, in tests performed by the author on actual WTC samples. This result is consistent with the low Iodine-131 measured by independent researchers (point 2 above) and the low radionuclide counts (point 4 above) and again provides compelling evidence against the mini-nuke-at-Towers hypothesis. No fatalities due to radiation burning were reported near ground zero. William Rodriguez survived the North Tower collapse. No observed melting of glass due to the collapse-process of the Towers. One more: The mini-nuke idea fails completely for WTC 7 where vertically-directed plumes of dust were absent during the collapse, and the building fell quite neatly onto its own footprint. (Molten metal was observed under the WTC7 rubble as well.) Some promoters of the nuclear demolitions baloney, such as Gordon Duff, cite as evidence a claim that 9/11 first responders have been dying from radiation sickness.
Posted on: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 01:35:48 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015