The current examples are Snowden Operation/Assange Operations and supporting Operations on the masses through media outlets. How they get you hooked in mass media and internet... Use Occams razor critical thinking when analyzing during your academic research studies to identify threats... -Art. :-) Tactics of Deception are formalized psychological warfare techniques. Tactics of Deception build a psychological environment that differs from the material environment. Tactics of deception are used to create false reality worlds. In terms of perceptual psychology, Tactics of Deception provoke illusory percepts. To influence behavior the deception must follow three basic rules. First, the deception must be reasonable; second there must be no simple way of checking the facts in the case; and third the use of deception should not discredit a source which may have valuable future potential. The media uses a tactic of deception called a Limited Hangout. Limited Hangouts are used to shape public opinion to support the aims of well planned psychological operations. Stories are carefully crafted to contain some of the truth while withholding key information. Tactics of Deception are nothing more than a sophisticated form of lying. The Council on Foreign Relations is a branch of the Round Table Group. The Round Table group has been controlling public opinion throughout the world for over 100 years. Other branches include; Britains Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Canadian Institute of International Affairs, the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, the Australian Institute of International Affairs, the South African Institute of International Affairs, the Indian Institute of International Affairs, the Netherlands Institute of International Affairs, the Japanese Institute of Pacific Relations, the Chinese Institute of Pacific Relations, and the Russian Institute of Pacific Relations. Tactics of Deception are practiced by left wing, right wing, and conservative media sources. Tactics of Deception are planned and coordinated by Council on Foreign Relations members. Not many people have heard of the Council on Foreign Relations or know how they operate. This is no accident, the group purposely maintains a low profile. One Tactic of Deception used by the press is reference to a vague ambiguous group called The Establishment rather than to the Council on Foreign Relations. A second Tactic of Deception is to shift the focus to another group. It is the influence of the Council on Foreign Relations that is at odds with the American ideal of popular government. Mother Jones shifts the focus of influence from the Council on Foreign Relations (aka the Establishment) to the MoJo 400. This tactic was adopted by mis-application of a Freemason strategy. The Freemasons were an international secret society whose principals were brotherliness, charity, and mutual aid. The Freemasons formed groups of circles within circles. The circles consisted of people with like experiences. The Freemasons believed such people shared a natural sympathy and understanding towards one another. Since the Freemasons belonged to different circles, a synergy would be produced that would benefit the entire Freemason group. The Round Table adopted the Freemason structure of circles within circles. The Round Table misused the concept to divide and conquer rather than to unite and benefit. Round Table members joined different circles. The MoJo 400 data base is another circle that Round Table Group (aka Council on Foreign Relations) members have joined. Round table members in one circle use their influence to create tension between their circle and other circles. Round Table Members in all circles try and sway the members in their circle to advance the aims of the Round Table Group even if the aims are at odds with the best interest of the members of the circle. The strategy is a type of covert operation. The method was formalized into one of the most effective types of propaganda delivery techniques ever devised. According to John Lanigan (Associate Director in Policy Analysis Department, Psychological Operations Staff Officer, Major USMC Ret.): Almost all studies on the subject of advertising or psychological operations are in agreement that face-to-face discourse is the most effective individual instrument of persuasion. The following psychological advantages are ... the primary reasons of its success: 1. It is more casually engaged in and will often attract an audience that would not trouble itself to receive the same information by other forms of mass communication. 2. the perpetrator of face-to-face discourse can mold his manner of presentation to suit a particular target audience. In this way, he can largely reduce resistance to his message. 3. By expressions of pleasure or displeasure, the target audience can be rewarded or punished for their reaction. 4. The source of face-to-face discourse may be a trusted or intimate friend of the target audience from whom information is believable; e.g., a clergyman. 5. It is sometimes possible to accomplish objectives without first instilling conviction. For instance, if the leader of a local young mens organization tells its members to sign up for service in the militia, some may join just to keep from discrediting themselves in the eyes of their leader. Hadley Cantril and Lloyd Free were Princeton University Social Psychologists; researchers; and members of the intelligence community. Council on Foreign Relations Member Nelson Rockefeller funded them to develop psycho-political policy strategies and techniques. CFR member Edward R. Murrow, would, with Rockefeller Foundation Funding conduct a research project to perform a systematic analysis of Nazi radio propaganda techniques and the political use of radio. A world wide monitoring and broadcasting Government agency called the Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service (FBIS) was the result of the study. A FBIS monitoring station was set up in London in liaison with the British Broadcasting Corporation. The FBIS became the United States Information Agency (USIA). The USIA was established to achieve US foreign policy by influencing public attitude at home and abroad using Tactics of Deception. The USIA Office of Research and reference service prepares data on psychological factors and propaganda problems considered by the Policy Planning Board in formulating psycho-political information policies for the National Security Council. The USIA would be responsible for foreign policy propaganda for the National Security Council. The USIA and National Security Council are controlled by the Council on Foreign Relations. bilderberg.org/roundtable/MoJo400.html
Posted on: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:31:08 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015