The numbers of scientific retractions have climbed more than 15-fold since 2001. What many dont realize is that even a small number of retracted studies can wreak absolute havoc with the science-based paradigm. Other scientists who have based their research on the results from studies that, for whatever reason, end up being retracted, are now perpetuating flawed science as well. In one example, two retracted medical studies led to the retraction of another 17. In this case, the first of Dr. Ronalds retracted studies has been cited eight times. The second? 113 times. That sounds like an awfully large cleanup job in a field thats already heavily criticized for its preponderance of lousy science, to use the words of award-winning geneticist Dr. David Suzuki. articles.mercola/sites/articles/archive/2014/03/11/retracted-gmo-studies.aspx
Posted on: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:53:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015