The police may use deadly force to shoot and kill a motorist who leads them on a reckless, high-speed chase, even if the suspects car is temporarily cornered, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday. In a unanimous decision, the justices threw out an excessive force claim brought against Arkansas police officers who chased a speeding car across the bridge into Memphis and shot the driver when he refused to give up. In the past, the court had said police may use force to stop a fleeing motorist because he represents a danger to the public. But the law has been unclear on whether deadly force can be used against the occupants of a stopped car. In the case decided Tuesday, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said the officers were justified in shooting the motorist because he continued to maneuver his car after he had been temporarily stopped by a squad car. As the motorist, Donald Rickard, tried to drive away, police fired 15 shots in all, killing him and a passenger. Alito also said officers deserve the benefit of the doubt when they are engaged in a high-speed pursuit. We analyze this question from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight, he wrote in Plumhoff v. Rickard. The case began on a summer night in 2004 when officers in West Memphis, Ark., pulled over a white Honda because the car had only one headlight. When an officer sought to question the driver, he sped away. godlikeproductions/forum1/message2558277/pg1
Posted on: Wed, 28 May 2014 10:07:01 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015