The politicians seem to have built a preconceived model in their mind that is designed to retrieve optimal expectation beforehand regardless of what form of analytic arguments (deductive/inductive) could follow. the output is understandably fixed no matter there could be developments/changes on the course of facts and evidences of a certain saga. In order to maintain their political expectation, whenever the facts and evidences refute their hypothesis nor is inconclusive to supplement their case, building unfit conspiracy theories, misinterpretation and misgivings would be the only way out . that is apparent when facts and evidences hardly support their optimal expectation. when facts and evidences contradict their expectation and tried to wrap up with their skill of articulation their comes intellectual mercenary. but at the end, it not only injure their political image (personality) the people will be exhausted and might not be inspired to your cause if in case facts and evidences support your model in future. + do cost and profit analyses before grabbing every saga for your political ends. isnt it selfish if not foolish to take the hijacking as a means to let the world know, the extent of injustice in the country as if we have no conclusive cases, before anything we heard from anyone around him including himself? do your political opportunism wise otherwise it backfires.
Posted on: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:31:07 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015