Then there was the more substantive reason given by Gonzales - TopicsExpress



          

Then there was the more substantive reason given by Gonzales Ramos. She noted that in the Indiana case, there weren’t any actual disenfranchised voters involved, nor any good evidence they existed. Which naturally amounts to an un-Constitutional poll tax, and charges of discrimination against minorities by virtue of the fact that a law applying to everyone equally would include them. Which I have always assumed to be part of the attraction in living here in the first place - but evidently not. watchdog.org/176686/cant-vote-bus-pass-tx-voter-id-law-struck-confusion/
Posted on: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 01:47:50 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015