There seems to be plenty of evidence that reincarnation exists ex Western world children disclosing sensitive information about deceased peoples lives that only the surviving family/close friends could know. Now sure there is a probability of some form of collusion between familys perhaps for fame and a moment in the spot light or perhaps as a form of religious, comfort with death, propagation. But what if there are plenty of legit cases, professionaly investigated? Now, scientists and psychologists require hard evidence and testable theorys in order to consider something to be true........... All theorys must be repeatable, tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation! And eliciting reincarnation in a repetitive, testable way, isnt going to be possible (as far as I know). Of course most scientists and psychologists/atheists will discredit the reincarnation theory merely because it adds an extra factor that perhaps influences human behaviour (Nature/Nurture & Soul) and makes reality too complex for their cookie cutter, manufactured concepts of reality. Plus consider all the misdiagnoses and current prevalent theory remodelling that would have to be done! Therefore only soft evidence for reincarnation exists, even softer still evidence for the existence of God/higher power. Therefore reincarnation and the concept of God will always most likely be considered un true by conventional science. Most likely at the detriment of all the people of Earth.
Posted on: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:32:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015