They say, I also believed, its not important what you look at ... but what you look for. I feel this is not correct, now. I have to look at in order to be able to reach the FOR. If I ignore at and only look for, then may be very small rock on the road will make fall. If I fall on smooth ground, even hard but absorb able I will get up and even, may be, stronger and more deterministic. The problem is the small rock which makes me fall might cause me to fall and break my head or hurt my foot ... depends where and on what will I fall. So in my opinion it should be: Its the most important what you look for ... but while you are moving forward look at ... it might cause you really to stop in at ... and never reach the FOR .... May be better to tell: its not the most important what you look at ... but what you look for ... the word MOST changes the game completely INDEED!!!
Posted on: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 22:04:32 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015