This applies actually for any conversation be it race, religion, - TopicsExpress



          

This applies actually for any conversation be it race, religion, not just gender. The whole problem is with the dont-ask-dont-tell mindset. The less we practise speaking in public our views, the less ably we articulate and the less sensitive we become to other humans. While the profs choice of words are regrettable, objectively, i cannot say its right to tell him to shut up. He has an opinion, however badly expressed. And he has gotten backlash as a result which is great because if u insult someone, dont expect non reaction. However, it is from these touchy discourses that we can begin to have a conversation. The conversation may be uncomfortable for many, and reading this thread, clearly a lot of ignorance about lgbt is displayed. Which is fine. Because we have never had a proper discussion about lgbt, how can we expect the man-in-the-street to have an informed conversation about the issues surrounding gay people abuse or rights? It is only when you encounter a family member or a loved one struggling with the issue can you empathize more fully. I am comfortable with attacking and provocative speech simply because as a community, we have to start somewhere. If there is ignorant hate speech, its important to educate. HPB has done an excellent job of opening up the discourse with its FAQ. That got everyone protesting and supporting but more importantly, it got people talking. Its better to talk, or even shout, than be silent and pretend a problem isnt there. Lgbt is not the norm and never will be, but if one begins to treat a human lesser than how one regards a dog, we have a serious problem folks. It is also with putting boundaries on speech that thinking gets impaired, and the fear of offense sets in, so no, while I do not agree with the professor, i disagree even more that the university should get him to retract his statements. The unis embracing of diversity is great and at best, they can remind people to be sensitive with their speech, but not to withdraw the talk! Otherwise, who else can come out to talk? Censoring talk means genuine discussion on lgbt even by its proponents takes a huge step back. Its bad for pro-lgbt, its bad for anti-lgbt. And conversation and maturity wont move forward at all. Is this the sort of society we want? I may be against hate speech but im even more opposed to infantilism of any kind especially when it comes to deep topics concerning life, spirituality, identity and autonomy of thought.
Posted on: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:30:13 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015