This is a horrible story but look how even in a scene where one human has killed another the media still uses segregational language to sway your view of all Muslims The man is described as Muslim which is fair if your going to describe the victim as christian as this would form a level argument and be could be dubbed a conflict of religious beliefs but seeing as they described the victim as Romanian what they are doing (although on a very subtle frequency) is presenting you with the information that Muslims are against the world and are unable to be cooperated into modern society if they would have called the killer Pakistani, Moroccan, Turkish they would have been fuelling a negative image of a countries people which is risky and illegal but by calling him Muslim you are able tar everybody with the same brush while keeping the good Muslims oblivious to where the real threat is coming from this is the kind of irresponsible journalism that Britain first and UKip supporters lap up and re share without a moments thought I am not condoning what this evil man did he deserves what he gets but if he is so dangerous they should publish his details e.g name, age, country of birth and political affiliations etc I dont see why his faith is the 1st word in the title yet his crime is only the 3rd
Posted on: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 10:39:43 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015