This is the most incoherent uneducated post Ive ever watched. Honestly. The debate on pit bulls is completely bias. And I can understand why people feel the way they do solely for the fact that they get a bad rap.They say the dogs are not inherently aggressive, but in many cases suffer at the hands of irresponsible owners drawn to the dogs macho image who encourage aggression for fighting and protection. Indeed, the ASPCA web site gives the breed an endorsement that could fit a golden retriever. It says, “A well-socialized and well-trained pit bull is one of the most delightful, intelligent, and gentle dogs imaginable.” In general, pit bulls aren’t aggressive with people but are rather “less tolerant” of other dogs than many other breeds. They also have great tenacity. They put their mind to something, and they do it. That’s what makes them great dogs. And in tho past, they had a fabulous reputation early on and were considered the ideal family pet because they were so good with people. Think about it, “Petey” from The Little Rascals was a pit bull. Helen Keller, President Theodore Roosevelt, and Fred Astaire all had the breed as family pets. But the tide turned in the late 1990s, when pit bulls became popular among people who weren’t focused on the positive attributes of the breed - they were looking for a strong, scary-looking dog,. But in my overall opinion, Every dog is an individual. Pit bulls are just dogs and if they are not raised properly and socialized and treated right, they can have behavior problems. But they aren’t any more problematic than any other breed by nature.
Posted on: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:15:31 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015