Time to revisit UK Middle East policy. The largely left-wing UK - TopicsExpress



          

Time to revisit UK Middle East policy. The largely left-wing UK anti-war movement has acquired a powerful right-wing ally: The maverick leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party and darling of the British media, Nigel Farage. Farage vigorously opposes the decision of Britain’s coalition government to instigate fresh military action in Iraq in order to counter the advance of the Islamic State and the alleged “clear and present danger” it poses to the UK. He portrays the action as rash and likely to render the UK less safe; he also alleges that Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron deliberately placed Britain on a heightened terror alert in the hope of eclipsing UKIP’s autumn conference. What really frightens Cameron, Farage suggests, is the United Kingdom Independence Party. And it is true that many Conservatives, including two MPs, have already defected to UKIP, believing that that the Conservative Party cannot be trusted to tackle immigration and grant an early referendum on British membership of the European Union. Thanks to Farage, the chances that Cameron’s party could win outright the next UK general election, in May 2015, appear increasingly slim. By contrast, the UKIP leader is shaping up as a key power broker in a UK beset with crisis over Europe, internal pressures for devolution in the wake of the Scottish referendum, and security fears about British Muslims enrolling as ISIS militants. Expected to become a Westminster MP next year (at present he is a member of the European Parliament), Farage was not able to participate in the parliamentary vote on Sept .25 that endorsed limited UK military intervention in Iraq. It must be said that the intervention is indeed limited, a symbolic gesture to advertise Britain’s membership of the US-led “coalition of the willing.” It could hardly be anything else since, thanks to drastic retrenchment on defense, British airpower has shrunk since the Iraq war of 2003. Confusingly, the action is being presented as limited even as Britain’s Defense Secretary Michael Fallon forecasts a military campaign lasting years. Certainly, the UK is at risk of falling prey to collective western “mission creep.” In Parliament, the respected Conservative MP, Rory Stewart, made a cogent case that airstrikes can be effectual in stemming the advance of ISIS. Outside Parliament, though, not a few deplore the lack of a thought-out UK strategy and suspect that token military action has been mandated in a desperate, panic-stricken effort to allay public horror at the beheadings of western hostages. Above all, critics of intervention point to the not exactly encouraging upshot of the British involvements in Afghanistan and Iraq and Libya. Three years ago, David Cameron boasted that UK air support of anti-Gaddafi rebels was paving the way for a new, democratic Libya. Now, with Libya in turmoil, he is silent on the subject. MPs congratulated themselves on the measured character of the debate on renewed intervention in Iraq. Yet not only was the debate light on strategic thinking, it also yielded precious little in the way of constructive proposals — the sort of imaginative statesmanship advocated last week by the retired British ambassador, Oliver Miles. In an article for the Guardian, Miles argued that the UK would do well to press for recognition of Palestine, something, he believes, that would enhance its standing in the Middle East, along with its ability to influence events. The sorry truth is that its actual record calls into question whether the British political establishment is capable of accomplishing anything much in the region beyond lining up behind the United States in the application of brute force. Many are bound to feel, especially in view of its possible domestic repercussions for a country with a large Muslim population, that UK policy in the Middle East needs to be refashioned, purged of its anachronistic imperial pretensions. With his hard-right stance, Nigel Farage is an unlikely, and perhaps not altogether welcome, bedfellow of the Muslims and leftists who dominate the UK anti-war lobby. All the same, this voluble “little Englander” could yet prove the most persuasive champion of the case that it is high time the UK controlled its compulsion to intervene in foreign lands and faced up to its modest capacities.
Posted on: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 03:07:10 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015