Tisbury Selectmen Meeting Nov 19, 2013 ...from what Mr. JOhn - TopicsExpress



          

Tisbury Selectmen Meeting Nov 19, 2013 ...from what Mr. JOhn Grande said, HOW COULD THE COMMITTEE discuss such long lists of issues, in just over an hour of the meeting? __________________ Put your mouse cursor on [145:50-] You will find the previously misrepresenting Summary of Parking Lot Design Commission, Nov 14, 2013 was being presented to Selectmen, and see how they tried to discourage the public comment to contest the INACCURATE representation of the public group. ___________________ The major issue of the meeting is : Mr. John Grandes Summary greatly lacked Definition of CONSENSUS was the major issue. ...Mr. Grande said it was all public Consensus Input. Wrong! Particularly, alarming things are said by both Tristan Israel, and Jeff Kristal. __________________ 1. [147:00, 150:00] Tristan Israel(Selectman, on the left) said, loudly, the committee discussion should have been limited to - Norton Lane Closure, - Utility Pole burial - Landscape design - Parking lot layout - (Removal of) Public Restroom - (Large Vehicle access, meaning paving out for Truck loading zone) 2. [153:50] Jeff Kristal (Selectman, in the center) - supporting Mr. Grandes Summary 3. [157:00~168:00] Mr. Grande, a town administrator, Not a planner, or MVC - reassured that this was the TRANSPARENT consensus of the Design Committee) - no objection was commented (because the committee were not familiar with all the agenda, yet) - ADA access issue, Utility, Egress, Police Station position (not concensus) - Stop & Shop maintain landscape (not discussed nor concensus) - Large vehicle radii limitation (not discussed) - Pavers vs. Painted Pedestrian Path (not discussed) - opaque screening of cars (not discussed) - Truck and Loading Operation-harder look again (correct) - Option 3 sketch (removal of Public Restroom), Mark London, Planning Board are familiar (INCORRECT), that does not show the restroom 4. [169:00] Tristan : issue with the Loading Area, confining. - question? 2-way parking circulation in Loading area? Way too 5. [171:20] John Grande - Do you, selectmen, want this restroom to block the open view? - Do you want to see the variations, presented by outside company? - yes, Jeff Kristal, [173:30] 6. [172.30] Tristan - make the public forum continue, now 7. [174:00] Conflict of Interest, addressed by Public - Jeff Kristal find the abutters, not a problem - Shut by Tristan 8. Tristan, Jeff Kristal [174:55] - Committee is not making the decision, they are just advisory 9. Jeff Kristal [175:00] - Jabbing and daggering us, we are done with the committee - committee rather be dissolved 10. Tristan Kristal [176:00] - Bathroom, circulation, Norton lane, landscape is what the committee is set up for 11. [177:20] - Public : Is the public comment allowed? 12. [177.50] Tristan Israel - commenting, Not the relationship with STOP&SHOP, but towns own project 13. One of the two(Mark London or Planning Board) could move forward - public meeting, not a public hearing 14 [179.50] ended
Posted on: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:18:44 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015