To those fighting I say stay strong and my heart is with you. To the people, I say we need to refocus, and not just think about the treatment of cancer, but methods to avoid it. There is a lot of evidence in support that cancer is caused by toxicity, and a genetic mutation of the body although this can be significantly different from patient to patient, cancer to cancer. More understanding speculates to show it is an evolutionary problem on the micro scale, and that there are treatable cures such as hemp oil, which of course is illegal, while America holds patents on the use of marijuanas key component THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) in medicine. Both show some truth to the treatment and avoidance of the varying cancers. Our very environment is killing us. Computers, Wi-fi, Phones, monitors, all these micro-waves. Industrial toxins, fumes of daily life. But would it be better for government and corporations who operate under a system of corporatism, to cut out the growth of computers and the web, and the advantages and business this brings, or is it better to say, go ahead with it, with some expectation of damage it will cause in human death, but it will allow for research to be done by the government, to find a cure one day in order to allow the businesses then to be able in the future to continue to run these damaging machines and industrial processes which damage our bodies. Covered by a cure so one day we evolve into a society that doesnt struggle with cancer. We dont eliminate the cause, we just produce another medicine on an ever expanding list. While making more business for pharma companies, originally burdened by the state, the people (majority), then passed onto those who can acquire it in privatisation. The super rich. Marijuana is an example of this, in that we have a cure, but its introduction may be costly on business as it has the obvious side effects, along with an increase in thinking outside the box, and exploring new types of knowledge. A natural pain relief, another reason this cure is bad for pharmaceuticals owned again and acquired by the super rich. Near 50% owned by the 1%. Theyve got a lot to lose by the introduction of such simple changes to our lives. Government and Corporations manipulated through politics by the super rich, make that decision, that it is okay to go into a new technology even if it kills people. As long as money can be made. Some may argue that communication is the ultimate goal in keeping the web active and in some way it is worth the sacrifice, but this is clearly not true demonstrated by the attack on net neutrality. To those who have lost loved ones to cancer, you know that your loved ones would want you to be strong and to smile.
Posted on: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:02:10 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015