Today I would like to talk about conspiracy theory. I have an idea that at some point someone possessing a vast intelligence, socially engineered the opposite of what our species needs to be at peace with itself. However, whether that is true or not really does not matter. what does matter is something we are losing, Empathy. when we look around today we see many accidents happening on the corporate front, we see many political figures doing things that even the simplest of things that any man or woman could agree upon that are narcissistic and destructive to the world that we live in. When I look around today and I see the simple fact that we cant make people, make choices that they dont want to make. If we asked them to do the responsible thing and step down from their position they will laugh. they will continue to sit in their towers and watch very unmoved as the world is poluted, the animals die, the people starve and fall into sicknesss simply because its not something they have to worry about. they are morally ambivallent because there is no direct consepuence that they cant throw money at. my first instinct is that I am left with a terrible problem that only has a very severe answer. Initially from a very blunt logical standpoint knowing that I cant change peoples minds away from what theyre set on doing. that would mean that in order to change the world that we live in there would need to be a complete routing of the current management. so of course, the first natural thought is murder. it is the simplest path of thought to take that solves the problem permanently. and not only a routing of the current management, but all the assets owned, wealth wise belonging to those people would need to be taken and redistributed. Furthermore when you think about the hierarchy of management thatsin place you cant focus on any one particular part. to make a real difference you would have to top to bottom simultaneously and instantly remove all the components that may be compromised. which unfortunately, that covers a lot of ground. that in a very brief list would involve the upper management of the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the department of Homeland Defense, the ATF, the executive branch, Congress, the Senate, anyone who has been groomed as the next in line for those seats of power, as well as the corporate hierarchy currently existing CEOs and upper management people (of any company that effects the well being of the planet and more over the condition of the air, water, soil, food, energy collection processes, media, some reiligous officials, and anything else I may have forgotten) that are vying for that position. all those people would have to be realistically removed from position, their assets frozen and instantly redistributed to all people evenly. Only in that way, could you then, ideally replace these people in positions of power with, scientists school teachers, farmers, the people that make up the core of life. that is what we need for our species, and all species on the planet, and the planet its self to continue to have a chance to live and grow. Otherwise we will destroy our planet, and we will do so for an idea that is a figment of the imagination. currency. monetary wealth. I mean, if you follow the raw science.. weve already solved so many problems we face as a species, and we have found ways to do so symbiotically. why are we not dropping everything and saving our planet and everything in it? so the idea that I propose to solve the problem of people with lifetime positions of power is this. we need to address out dated ethics that have not had any mjor changes in 2000 years and put in places a system that invokes empathy. for example, create new laws that demand personal accountability. how does this work? like this, if a C.E.O. of a company is found guilty of an offense requiring them to be fined. then not only to they have to make good on the fine, but if their companys accident effects a real world resource, like, air, water, food, soil, etc.. then the C.E.O. must actively, and physically participate in the clean up of the water spill, or corruption that has taken place. If it is a contaminate befouling the water, then they must drink it. if it is a contaminate affecting food stores they must exclusively eat that so they might understand and empathize with the effects of their creation so that they might learn to be more responsible for their actions. you can see where Im going with this. if they ruin the land, then they should be forced to live there. empathy. only experience can create that. and only they will ever be able to aptly judge themselves. so I guess this drunk rant is just a seed pleaing for empathy training of the elite, the politicians, and some religious extremists. we need some good ol fashioned whats good for the goose, is good for the gander.
Posted on: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:17:11 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015