Trina Legge I was definitely ACTING STRANGELY IN THE COURT BC OF PENAL CODE 118 PC REGARDING PERJURY AND FALSE NAMES of that womans and how the court did not CHOOSE to clarify WHICH MIGHT ONLY BE CONVICTABLE WITH SWORN IN TESTIMONY; HOWEVER, ITS STILL NOT A CIVIL ACTION BC HER FALSE NAME DID NOT ARISE OUT OF HER OWN TESTIMONY AND I HAD ALREADY SENT IT TO THE CLAIMS ACT ATTY FROM THE WHISTLEBLOW ABOUT FALSE NAMES OUT OF THAT OFFICE BEFORE THE COURT WITH HER PERVERSE CURTAILMENT ACTIONS WHERE HER BROTHER IS THEN FOUND ONLINE AT THAT JOB LATER. I FOUND OUT ABOUT HER JUST BEFORE SHE TOOK ME TO COURT; NOT IN THAT OFFICE. HE SERVED ME WITH DIVORCE PAPERS IN JANUARY 2012. SHE TOOK ME TO COURT WITH A RESTRAINING ORDER IN FEBRUARY 2012 COMPLAINING ABOUT 40 EMAILS TO KEITH PERTAINING TO THE NAME MISREPRESENTATION IN THAT OFFICE AGAINST CODE 17900 AND STATE CASE LAW THE PEOPLE V. RATHERT AND ABOUT OUR HOUSE AND A CONVERSATION I HAD WITH HIM ABOUT HAVING A BABY IN DECEMBER 2011 WHICH IS PRIOR TO AN ENTRANCE OF DIVORCE OR BEFORE I KNEW WHO THAT WOMAN ACTUALLY IS WHILE I WAS TRYING TO EXPLAIN TO HIM WHAT IN THAT OFFICE IS A CRIME. i was injured on the job before i knew of her and @ 3 months into that job and she took me to court with him after he had knowledge of THEIR fraud in THAT office where i had not located them online with her brother yet. (NOVEMBER 8 2010 COMMENCEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT; INJURED BY LATE JANUARY 2011 ; DOCUMENTED TO MCFATE AS AN ADVERSARY;I SAID NOT TO SELL MY HOUSE IN MAY 2011, KEITH DID NOT LISTEN, COMPANY DID NOT REMOVE FALSE NAMES; WOMAN SHOWS UP IN LATE 2011 AFTER I TOLD BANK ABOUT MISREPRESENTATION IN EMPLOYER AND POSSIBLE DURESS) AFTER THE WOMAN TAKES ME TO COURT FOR REPLYING TO HER AND TELLING HER TO GO AWAY AND USES ANOTHER NAME THAT IS LIKELY FALSE, I LOCATED THAT OFFICE WITH THE WORKERS USING FALSE NAMES AND HER BROTHER SITTING THERE ONLINE ON A PROFILE OF A MUTUAL FRIEND IN THAT OFFICE. I ALSO THEN LEARNED OF THE WEIRD DATES ON HER HOUSE. I LIVE IN CALIFORNIA BUT THIS IS ALL TRUE AND I AM CITING CHAPTER 19 FALSE PRETENSES AND CHEATS FROM THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BC IT ACTUALLY IS HOW IT IS. they said mcfate did not do that in that office. THE WOMAN TAKING ME TO COURT OR HAVING HER BROTHER ONLINE AT MY JOB AT ALL OR ANYTHING WEIRD ON HER HOUSE WHEN I HAD NEVER CONTACTED HER WAS NOT A PROPER WAY TO INTRODUCE HERSELF. SHE IS NOT IN CHARGE OF MY BEDROOM .
Posted on: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:02:24 +0000