Vești bune pentru Vitalia Vangheli-Pavlicenco de la Curtea Europeana pentru drepturile omului si mai proaste pentru bugetul de stat Just satisfaction (Article 41) The Court held that the Republic of Moldova was to pay Ms Pavlicenco 3,600 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 5,289.60 for costs and expenses. Relying on Article 6 § 1 (access to court), the applicants (D-nul Urecheanu si D-na Pavlicenco) alleged that they could not bring libel actions against the then president of their country (Voronin) on account of his immunity and that they had therefore been denied their right of access to a court for the determination of their civil rights. Mr Urechean submitted in particular that the then President’s accusations against him were part of ongoing systematic harassment to which he had been subjected. Ms Pavlicenco contended that the accusation about her belonging to the KGB had been extremely defamatory and had been aired at prime-time on a television channel with national coverage and that she had requested airtime to express her views, without success.
Posted on: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 12:20:20 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015