Viewpoint of Researchers on Indian China Relationship English Translation :- SINO-INDIAN EXCHANGES SHOULD MOVE TOWARDS from SINGLE SUBJECT to MULTIPLE SUBJECTS........ In mid-September to late President Xi Jinpings visit to India, brought China and India expect to join the good wishes of prosperity. Cooperation in trade, economy and India important investment, China has also made an unprecedented commitment, and are put into action. The Indian government on Chinas top leaders over standard of hospitality, government and people for the high-level visits have shown unprecedented sustained heat. This historic meeting between the leaders of China and India, was also important for the international community to interpret geopolitical events. After the farewell Chinese leaders visit by Indian Prime Minister Modi embarked on a journey nonstop. The US government heavyweight think tank of Indo-US joint balance the rise of China, the appeal, in India politics, business, academia actually been widely respond quickly. Seems enormous economic cooperation between China and India space, associated with deep historical and recent frequent high-level interaction, does not seem to eliminate some of the Indian elite rise of China held ingrained doubts. Generations of Chinese and Indian leaders to achieve the aims of Sino-Indian co-prosperity dream, it is imperative to solve the problem of trust between the two countries from the national level to the community level accumulation. If the lack of mutual trust, the initial results of high-level visits will likely stay in the paper. Distrust between China and India, although most visually reflected in major policy areas diplomacy, defense, economy, etc., but its roots, but it is due to the interaction between the two countries do not understand the community, lack of communication accumulated deficit of trust. This do not understand each other, but also largely blocked one-dimensional. India from New York Institute (ICI) of the new institute Niemi Koogler Rian (Nimmi Kurian) professor recently at an international conference that the current discussion and cooperation between China, India, and much to be concerned about New Delhi, defense, foreign affairs and other so-called national interests at stake, the issues and organizations holding such discussions difficult to go beyond territorial disputes, competition and other big countries prone to hostility and relatively closed dimensions, greatly limits the possibility of both China and India expand rich dialogue. This Dialogue - impasse and death cycle, to the two very bad people convey negative signals, always in aggravating the crisis of confidence has been formed. Authoritative pollsters studies have shown that up to 83 percent of the Indian people believe that Chinas presence is a threat to India. Similarly, nearly 90 percent of Chinese Internet users on the countrys overall negative attitude towards India. Interestingly, such a highly homogeneous view is not based on a large number of exchanges between the two peoples and fully understood. Rather, it is a single source of information, so that some discussion on the agenda is temporarily unable to make a breakthrough, and when there is friction between the two countries on the one hand to deepen the mutual elite suspect, on the other hand, through the mass media and social networks, These negative information has a limited impact on the public perception of each other. Even more worrying is the lack of well-intentioned public awareness, there may be counterproductive to the important decisions, thereby increasing the trust is rooted in between China and India is not dead loop. To break the cycle of death, the first to break the existing extremely single agenda setting, channels of dialogue and communication methods, multiple subjects should be encouraged to participate in a variety of wide-ranging exchange to India. The so-called multiple subjects, namely: In addition to government-led outside, including academic, cultural, technological, commercial and other types of groups, organizations and individuals, should also serve as a positive force in international exchanges involved. In the 21st century, the BRIC countries and all the rapid rise of emerging economies in the international arena, breaking the old world pattern. Especially in the wake of the financial crisis, the European debt crisis broke out, a multipolar world is a foregone conclusion. The new pattern of breeding many new governance challenges, traditional governance body, such as large-scale national and international organizations, has been unable to respond quickly to a lot of problems. This gives multiple subjects play a more important role in international affairs, provides a broad stage. Interaction and cooperation between China and India, not from the general trend of international governance. In fact, many multiple subjects has been active on the stage of the Sino-Indian cultural exchange. The author in January 2013 at the University of Oxford and Zhao Meixin (Danielle Defeo-Giet) co-founded called juxtaposition Juxtapose-- international comparative study of contemporary India Forum academic and multicultural organizations, pluralistic dialogue aims to promote the States elites in various fields as well as governments and international organizations on contemporary China and India face common challenges of understanding and cooperation; and also to compensate for the global intellectual and India for interdisciplinary comparative research methods blank. To really integrate into the local community voices from China and India, after the 2013 Oxford University held its first session of the International Forum, the second annual forum in September this year, came to New Delhi, India, held in the highest institution of the Jawaharlal Nehru University. At this meeting, in addition to scholars from the United States, Britain, China, India, Israel and other countries speech, more active in India and international sectors, India is committed to enhancing the exchange of groups and individuals to participate in the sharing of multiple subjects Indian exchanges story. The current reality is, whether it is from the academic, cultural, technology, or multiple subjects from the business community, to participate in the exchange and India also faces many obstacles. In September this year, the meeting, Reina (Rajeswari Raina) from the Indian National Science Dr., Technology and Development Institute (NISTADS), and delivered the closing speech of Jawaharlal Nehru University Professor Xie Gang (Srikanth Kondapalli) expressed distrust between the two countries, particularly evident in the treatment of researchers visa problems. Their research project led by China and India, was invited several times due to Chinese scholars can not get Indian visa and helpless to give up. In addition to visits visa barriers caused by the existing financial support is not sufficient, it is far from being a positive force in the play on the Sino-Indian interaction support multiple subjects. Excessive concentration of resources in the traditional governance body, it is possible not only wasteful, but also largely stifled the body, especially the emerging vibrant youth to actively participate in Indias vast possibilities exchanges. Needless to say, Sino-Indian relations on the stability and prosperity of Asia and the world had a significant impact. Leaders of China and India in the recent historic meeting, bilateral relations and opportunities. However, high-level interaction must be accompanied by diverse, multi-layered, vibrant civil exchanges in order to ensure their smooth functioning lasting and truly establish long-term cooperation based on mutual trust. Multiple subjects become a new trend in global governance today, more diverse way of communication, about the future trend of China-India relations.
Posted on: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:58:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015