WHAT I SAID TO KEN HAM on Twitter about his debate will Bill Nye: Ken, the difference between us and evolutionists is not just interpretation of scientific evidence. Thats only part of it. There is positive evidence were here by intelligent design and creation. That positive evidence should have been presented. I do thank God for your life changing and God honoring ministry. I wish you became more specific with the positive evidence. You presented a well philosophical perspective but didnt show the science refuting macro-evolution and supporting creation. Information, in any form, is positive evidence for intelligent origin. Thats what DNA is. Even Carl Sagan said sequential radio signals would be evidence of intelligent origin. What about the sequence of molecules in the genetic code? Richard Dawkins feared that Bill Nye wouldnt win the debate if it revolved around biology, but Ken Ham never got around to the biological evidence, especially regarding DNA and how the sequence of molecules in DNA, making it a code, is powerful prima facie evidence for intelligent origin and cause. Ken Ham has a great ministry with his website. How sad that he did not use information from his own site to refute Nye. Its just too sad!
Posted on: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 20:00:14 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015