We all know Wrestling is fake 95%, but some things are real. In regards to Vince McMahon VS Bret Hart (right & wrong) Im on Vinces side and here is why... 1= If it wasnt for Vince, Bret wouldnt have even made it as far as he did in pro Wrestling and although Bret did a great job with his character no man is bigger than an Island. 2= WCW was able to offer Bret more money, so he choose greed over loyalty, now what happened in Montreal was wrong by both guys, Vince for making Bret go out like that and Bret was wrong for spitting at Vince Im spitting in someones face is wrong especially when 85% of Wrestling fans that would have witnessed that are just kids themselves. I know WWE is just 2 grown men pretending to hurt each other, but its still more dangerous than what people understand I mean if WWE was 100% safe, then Own Hart would still be alive, so we still need to respect these guys for risking their lives to entertain our children, but maybe we need to do more background checks on Wrestlers that are about to be introduced to the sport after the Chris Benoit situation. Im not a crime investigator and I wouldnt have the intelligence for that line of work even if I wanted to be, but I would say there is a 10% chance Vince choose to get back at Bret for what Bret did to Vince after his match with Shawn Micheals by organising the death of his brother Own by making it look like an accident, as it seems very strange how one brother gets his reputation destroyed whilst the other dies, now thats a strange coincidence if ask me.
Posted on: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 06:58:51 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015