. Who have to protect Judicial Propriety - Lawyers or Judges ? . Courts are temples of Justice in any democratic country. Lawyers take it as their life till the last breath. Even without any work, ripened senior lawyers daily or frequently come to Court in dress with deep sentimental feeling of home-coming. But, retired Judges never visit Courts as if they are in no way concerned to the premises, . Advocates feel proud whenever Courts pass a dynamic verdict for Democracy and Nation in strict compliance of law without any fear or favour. At the same time, feel disappointed whenever any verdict is delivered vice versa in favour of an unlawful act of the government, . Hard work with humble presentation of case is the way of life for good advocates; smilingly swallow irrelevant arrogant humiliating comments of even junior Judges from the bench for a simple reason that advocates act in representative capacity only to save the interests of their clients but not to show their inherent quality of superiority and self respect out of respect to protect Judicial Propriety, . In recent past, entire World has witnessed how Pakistan Higher Judiciary and Legal fraternity fought against tyrannical military rule to protect not only their Judicial Propriety but also democratic fabric of their Nation; disqualified Pakistan Prime Minister to continue in Constitutional office on several charges and ultimately impeached him from PM Office; the then legendary CJP Justice Iftikar Choudary didnt care his life to protect and preserve Judicial Propriety of Pakistan Judiciary and also democratic fabric of his Nation, . Comparatively, what Indian Higher Judiciary and Judges are doing ? Most of the wise Indians knows the answer. Is there any landmark Judgment changing democratic course of the Nation for the past 21 years after 1st Indra Sahani case ? . Running live example is - Acting very cool against undemocratic division of Andhra Pradesh; simple admission of Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 without Stay, referring the matter to Constitutional Bench; allowing the most arbitrary Act to put on process by the Supreme Court of India, repeatedly by the same bench of Justce L. Dattu, aspirant of CJI, is an unparalleled example in post independent Indian Judicial History. Only The God can save Bharat, as usually.
Posted on: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:12:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015