"Why are a small group of scientists even permitted to tell a much larger group of people that because science believes a poison is good for us that we need to keep placing it in the water supply? What track record does science hold in regards to its’ foundational belief that toxins are what we all need to live better lives anyway? Does being told what to do sound democratic or is there something else going on? Why are we the citizens not permitted to vote on important issues such as these? As citizens we do count on our elected officials to decide certain things for us but doesn’t it appear that our elected officials have out sourced the fluoride decision to a couple of scientists? Was the entire population fairly represented? Or is that the point? Are we being slowly conditioned that science will rule over us, that poison is good for us and to pay taxes toward the very structure that’s destroying the functionality of our society? "
Posted on: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:44:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015