Why would an officer of the court knowingly hand out, on paper a - TopicsExpress



          

Why would an officer of the court knowingly hand out, on paper a law that has not been on the books since 1985????To sway this jury in Wilsons direction!!It was clear the prosecutor was partisan in this case, and not partisan in the way prosecutors usually are, which is to get people indicted.” ” All of this is bad enough but as the enclosed video shows prosecutor Kathi Alizadeh passed out a copy of Missouri law that was declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court in 1985. The law allows a police officer to shoot a suspect who is running away to escape arrest. The appended video discusses the issue in detail. Having given the jury this grossly misleading document the jury then heard Wilsons testimony: “The grand jury then listened to Officer Wilsons testimony with the belief that anything he did to Michael Brown would be fully justified legally simply because Michael Brown at some point ran away from Officer Wilson . . . the District Attorneys office allowed the grand jurors to travel back in time to the good old days of American law enforcement when the cops could shoot people for running away . . . . ” Using this document the jury could hardly decide other than not to indict Wilson since the evidence is clear that at one point Brown was running away.
Posted on: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:11:25 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015