Why would our government defend this mute argument, when there is no statue of limitations on the death of animals and humans, after the consumption of toxins? The out come of this case will have a major impact on the Camp Lejeune water contamination issue. CTS Corporation, Petitioner v. Peter Waldburger, et al. BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PETITIONER, Donald B. Verrilli Jr. Solicitor general of records: americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v3/13-339_pet_amcu_usa.authcheckdam.pdf. QUESTION PRESENTED. Whether a provision of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., proving a federal commencement date for the running of state statues of limitation as applied to suits involving hazardous substances, 42 U.S.C. 9658, Preempts a North Carolina statue cutting off liability ten years after a defendants last relevant act or omission. This question at bar is mute, because most victims that consume hazardous toxins is never informed within the statues limitation. Most toxins are not even discovered in soil or water tell years and some time centuries after the fact. Most hazardous toxins are consumed by humans as a result of illegal dumping or illegal storing of hazardous toxins with little or no knowledge by the general public.
Posted on: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:35:28 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015