With motive to kill Right to Recall proposals, AAP leaders Yogendra Yadav and Sanjay Singh speak lies that Right to recall is not possible without Constitutional amendment and RTR is not possible without law in Parliament, and Assembly cannot print RTR laws !! Please see two one-minute videoes. Are they speaking this lie with approval of AK? Its a lie. In fact, RTR-Delhi-Mayor and RTR-Delhi-Corporator is something ONLY Delhi Assembly can pass not Parliament. And clauses of RTR over Delhi Lokayukt can be framed ONLY by Delhi Assembly and not by Parliament. And RTR over Delhi officers such as Dictrict Education Officer, District health Officer, Electricity Regulator, Water Supply Officer etc can be passed ONLY by Delhi Assembly and not by Parliament !! And Assembly using a feature of loophole in laws can pass RTR-MLA-draft as well as RTR-CP-draft (see section-40.4 and section-6.6 of rahulmehta . com\301.htm ) One way to convince you not to take a medicine you need to to quote you 100 times more price than it costs. Thats the methods #AKisWorseThanCongressiBjpLeader AK is now using to tell activists to give up Right to Recall demand. Via Yogendra Yadav and Sanjay Singh, now AK is peddling lies that 1. RTR will need constitutional amendments 2. RTR will need law in Parliament . Pls see these two videos youtube . com/watch?v=ERj3KZ-hFwI कार्यकर्ता - आर.टी.आर. पर सवाल उठा रहा है कई लोग जी आर.टी.आर. क्यों नहीं ले कर आ रहे है ? जनलोकपाल के अंदर आर.टी.आर. क्यों ले के नहीं आ रहे है ? ‘राइट टु रिकोल’ – सर योगेन्द्र यादव --- ‘राइट टु रिकोल’ कोनस्टीटयुनली है जिसको कोई भी अपनी मरजी से नहीं डाल शकता | भारत की संसद उस पर कुछ कर शक्ति है, कोई राज्य या विधानसभा कुछ कर नहीं सकती पहली बात और जो लोग कह रहे है तमाम तरह की वाट बात वो ठीक है जैसा जिसका स्वभाव है जिसको जो चीज अपने मुह में सुहाती है वो बोलता है | ====== see youtube . com/watch?v=C0ooQkTG8DQ कार्यकर्ता - लोकपाल आप पास कराना चाहते हो, उसके अंदर आर.टी.आर. है ? संजय सिंह - देखो लोकपाल की जितनी भी बाते है, हम लोगोने अपने जो ओरीजीनल ड्राफ्ट हम लोगोने गवर्मेन्ट को दिया था जिसके लिए अगस्तमें आन्दोलन किया था अन्नाजीने १३ दिन का अनशन किया था उसी तरह का लोकपाल दिल्ली के अंदर हम लोग पास करेंगे उसमें से कोई भी मुद्दा हटाना नहीं है | जो हमने जिसके लिए लड़ाई लडी थी तिरंगा लेकर निकले थे उसमे से कोई भी चीज हम लोगो के कटनी नहीं है | कार्यकर्ता - उसमें [लोकपालमें ] ‘राइटी टु रिकोल’ है सर ? संजय सिंह - लोकपाल के अंदर राइट टु रिकोल कहा है, ‘राइट टु रिकोल’ का कानून अलग से बनता है| लोकपाल में कहा है राइट टु रिकोल | उसकी डिमान्ड हम लोगोंने अलग से की है| ‘राइट टु रिकोल’ का कानुन पार्लामेंट को बनाना है, वो एसेम्बली थोड़ी बना शक्ति है ? ‘राइट टु रिकोल’ का कानुन है वो पार्लामेंट बना शक्ति है | ===================== AK himself has never said this lie per se. But he has ordered other AAP leaders to peddle this lie, so that activists lose interest in Right to recall. Now this is what I had written years and years ago in my book rahulmehta . com/301.htm , see section-13.19 ==== Following are some key characteristics of psuedo-recallists, and a way to counter a psuedo-recallist : 4. Psuedo Recallists will never refute claims of anti-recallists that RTR procedures are impractical or unconstitutional : A psuedo recallists will make tall claims for Right to Recall. And then when anti-recallists make counter-claims that RTR is impractical, these psuedo-recallists will never refute their claims, and thus they will create an image that RTR is indeed impractical. The best example of 1951-1977 was Jayprakash Narayan. The paid-media appointed him as the torch bearer of Right to Recall movement. To give lip service, JPN would always support Right to Recall 3 times a month. During debates, JPN will give draftless and abstract speech on RTR. Next, the anti-recallists such as Morarji Desai will make claims that “RTR will increase instability, will be too expensive etc”. And guess what --- JPN will never ever refute these claim. So to a large chunk of audience, RTR will appear as money-wasting and bad proposal. As of today (Nov-2011), The Anna is the biggest psuedo-recallists skillfully letting anti-recallists win the debate. Eg. The Anna claimed he supports RTR in apr-8-2011 and again on 28-aug-2011. Next, many anti-recallists such as CEC, LKA etc said that “RTR will instability”. And The Anna deliberately did not refute the claim, which created an impression in many people that RTR is indeed too expensive and can cause instability. How can a true recallist counter this trick : Explain to audience that the some of proposed RTR drafts, such as the drafts I have proposed, are practical, and hence the leader who is not refuting these claims is damaging RTR, and hence he is a psuedo-recallist. === Here AK has gone one step ahead. He himself via Yadav etc is now saying that RTR is unconstitutional and would need change in constitution !!! SHAME ON PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT LIARS LIKE AK, YOGENDRA YADAV etc
Posted on: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:43:37 +0000