Yesterday, a three-judge panel ruled that the language contained in Obamacares previously unread 2000+ pages specifically spells out an inconvenient truth: federally funded subsidies are illegal for anyone purchasing health insurance policies from the federally-run exchanges (ie, Healthcare.gov) in 36 states. Conservatives and constitutionalists were quick to cheer, predicting that the legal ruling might represent a long-awaited death blow to Obamacare. But their hope was short won: only hours later, another federal appeals court overruled the first federal appeals court, and said that because the critical language in the law was ambiguous, it could be interpreted by the IRS (the heavily armed, politically partisan enforcement wing of Obamacare) to mean whatever the hell they wanted it to mean. To put it another way, if a law is incomprehensibly confusing, the appeals court says it should be interpreted by an agency that cant even follow the simple instructions (not to mention laws) for backing up their emails. hopenchangecartoons.blogspot/2014/07/tear-down-this-law.html
Posted on: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:13:09 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015