Zales, 09-09-10 Ms. LE, you asked me about “That Girl” and the “Ring Thing”. Let me explain. On 09-09-10 I explored the possibility of bringing in a new partner. I did so on a conditional basis by purchasing, on lay away, a promise ring. Within three months that prospective recruit cashed it in to pay some of “her bills”, which wasnt rent. I covered that roommate rent”, because she deceived me into believing she was broke. That was the closing moment in any possibility of having a prospective working partnership with this prospective recruit. The recruit could have asked her boy friend David Schmidt to advance her on some cash, as she did, for example, for a $700 luxury plane ticket for a vacation trip to Tennessee. Yep, she could have, asked her sugar daddy David Schmidt, as she has done numerous times in the course of their relationship. But she chose not to. Moreover, when she later did have some cash, she chose not to return to invest or buy-back in to that partnership. Yep, she liquidated the relationship and kept cashs cash from the ring too - for herself. It seems she felt entitled to keep anothers cash, for herself and hers. This is no friend and certainly no “partner”. That former relation is one that will never be in my friend circle. I state this to publicly clarify to you and every one else in the event that anyone might harbor some delusional misunderstanding about simple facts, selfish acts. By this I reference David Scmidts favorite breakfast place - MIMIs café, indicative of the psychological “Me, Me, Me” disorder. I kept the attempt by Zales as a cause of action for me and mine. Its forever burned in formal Federal Court Record in the De Beers price fixing case. I filed the receipt and my work product analysis in the same window of time, as Article III standing. I trust this clarifies any confusion over “That Girl” and “That Ring Thing”. If not, I am ready, willing and able to expand with further details because anyone that liquidates a token or symbol of a relationship with me liquidates our relation – period. The bottom line is that I told you in ’01, “I’ll wait for you.” I did not get married or otherwise form any partnership for life like relation since we last were. I never had any intention of doing so, getting married or otherwise, until I received direct word from you that you no longer desire me to keep that promise. I understand that you now have been “married” twice. That is of no legal significance to me. I’m still waiting. And yes, I do believe I have a solid shot with you. Statistics confirm that you are likely to get “divorced” - after having learned much, no doubt.
Posted on: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 06:45:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015