_____________________________________________________ MH370 WHAT DO WE KNOW? WHERE DOES THE EVIDENCE LEAD US? WHERE DOES THE SPECULATION LEAD US? WHY WOULD WE BE LED AWAY? The Very Best Information from a truly independent source, that has nothing to lose is the data provided by INMARST. Inmarsat is a private independent International Company which provides Satellite-based Communications services, telephone, fax and internet to ships and aircraft inflight. If you have ever used a flight phone, or been on a cruise ship and made a phone call home, you have used Inmarsats services. They use a network of Geostationary satellites 22,000 miles above the equator to provide these services. Although in constant motion, these satellites orbit the earth in such away that they appear to be parked in a fixed location. These satellites can transmit GPS data but do not track GPS or collect and generate positioning data on their own, there is no need to provide that function in order to provide their services. So Inmarsat by collecting data on WHICH of their Satellites was accessed, at what time and which set of transponders were used by the satellite can use this information to paint a line in the form of an arc from north to south along which they can determine the communication was received from and transmitted to. BUT, its just a line, the actual position can be anywhere along that line. Signal strebgth can be used to analyze interpret and estimate the most likey positon along that line, but in the end its just an estimated guess. In this case that line extends from well north of LaHore Pakistan to the Extreme South Indian Ocean where the debris search is being conducted now. Investigations proceed by two basic methods by human nature. The best way is to search the information you have and allow it to take you in the direction it leads. But human nature causes us to assess the information and draw conclusions to shorten the distance to the next way point on the journey. These theories about where that next clue is to be found. Sometimes human nature points us in directions and we begin discarding the information that just does not lead us where our last conclusion told us we were likely going to end up. Every time we draw a conclusion, it creates an opportunity to influence our future choices. Including the opportunity to mislead us. So we know the line of an arc along which the airplane flew for all those hours that the engine maintenence system pinged the Inmarsat satellite or vice versa, the satellite checks and the management system says HERE I AM. There are many reasons to believe the plane crashed in the water. There is a lotof water, a lot more water than land over this arc. There is a lot of reason to believe that the plane crashed on land because there is substantial land under this arc, but MUCH less than water. Then there is the last possibility, that the plane landed intact somewhere along the arc. There are only a relatively few runways where a visual landing of an airplane of this size and weight could be safely accomplished. If such an airplane were diverted and landed, it would most likely be for some future use as a manned, piloted cruise missile to deliver on a single specific target up to 200 tons of jet fuel as a payload as were the three airplanes of 9/11. Public knowledge of this possibility would by necessity expose the limitations of the worlds respective governments to effectively prevent such use, along with the demand that any such use be prevented. So it becomes both relatively easy and inexpensive to divert attention away from that possibility, to the likelyhood that theplane continued along the last known heading, and crshed at some point unknown in the vast and very deep oceans. It becomes quite expensive and much more risky to allow attention to be focused on the relatively narrow and admittedly much less likely probability that the airplane was diverted and will be used as a weapon of terror.
Posted on: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:18:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015