a lot of mixed feelings out there about this uproar toward rolling stone. it seems rolling stone has always been a magazine about celebrating pop culture, so to put an accused criminal on the cover with a byline indicating he has already been convicted shows that somehow with no advance warning to the fans they have confused their branding of celebratory covers more into sensational tabloid magazine sales driven ideas. it for sure is jarring to see such an established business model change course so rapidly and wonder if they are confused or if this is a deliberate strike. even though there is no doubt of this guys guilt, if we are to respect the system of laws we live by, then he should be referred to as an alleged bomber. i know if i were jay-z or willie nelson i would not be too pleased about being lumped on the cover of rolling stone with this motherf&%@*r. too far? maybe so this time. huffingtonpost/2013/07/16/rolling-stone-boston-bomber-cover_n_3607630.html
Posted on: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:35:49 +0000