“…. except if there is an injured party.” Published by admin under Knowing Who You Are Good grief! Am I tired of hearing that! –– from ALL the gurus. They are wont to reveal their ‘solution to everything’. “Here’s what to say, what to write, what to do, how to behave –– we’ve done it; this WORKS! This “process” will work for you, too, unless, of course, there is an injured party.” There is NEVER an ‘injured party’! To whom could they possibly be referring?!?! The court system operates in commercial, equity, contract, trust, maritime, probate, admiralty …. law and there is NO other “law”, in a fraudulent “justice system”. It is ALL about money and there exist only codes, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, by-laws, acts, bills, legislations, constitutions, policies, customs, treaties, and charters to support this fraud. There is NO “law” other than the dog and pony show they put on in court for the entertainment of the public servants and for the deceit of the rest of us. I continue to hear about “the common law”, meaning that we must not harm another or his property. But this is just one more of THEIR ‘laws’. So, if we do harm another, then the matter goes to court. What kind of court? There is ultimately only one kind of court––the kind that is ALL about MONEY! There is never anything to do with human rights, common law rights, civil rights, etc., unless it has something to do with money. The mere fact that money is the form of compensation which is offered to an alleged ‘injured party’ tells us that we cannot UNDO any harm done to anyone. Court is ALL about punishment which is all about ‘money’. Sure, sometimes a man will win, but this is only to maintain the facade that “justice has prevailed”. It is only to keep us coming back in hopes of a win (think Las Vegas). Yes, ‘common law’ is how we can file a civil suit where a man can exact damages from another man, but, again, this, also, is to the court’s advantage. A contract must exist, in order to prove a breach in all marriage, business, and professional contracts. The state demands we obtain a licence for everything because the licence is what deems us to be public servants whom the state controls. Most of us do not want to harm our fellows but, unless the court system can prove that we were involved in the function of government at the time of an incident, i.e.: acting as public servants (the only entities over whom the state has jurisdiction) then, the courts have no authority. Our possession of a licence makes their job of proving that we are, indeed, public servants easier, even though they must prove that we were behaving as such, at the time of the incident. It would be easier not to have a licence and, thus, not be a public servant, so that the matter of their jurisdiction is not even a possibility. As always, the only way anyone has authority over us is via our consent. Licensure suggests consent and we must remain very vigilant not to fall into the trap of believing that the courts have jurisdiction over us when we do not have them. The instant that an alleged injured party is “injured”, he complains to someone who files the complaint into the court which creates a case matter between two corporate entities, i.e.: legal fictions. Neither the court nor the agents of the court, which includes both the alleged plaintiff and the alleged defendant, can be a living man or woman because living men and women cannot operate in court or in commerce or in the public. We require a title or role in their fiction, in order to do so. The title of that role IS a legal fiction. Court is for legal fictions, public trustees, and employees of the government, and no man has any right or any obligation to be in court, for any reason. Court is merely the forum where legal fictions occasionally compensate the alleged victim with ‘money’ or punish the alleged victimizer via confiscation of his ‘money’, and for the monetary enrichment of the court employees; no other reason. But all parties to any court action are legal fictions, not men and women. This is just another way we are tricked into believing in their illusion. No one can harm a legal fiction/corporation/illusion/name. I am reminded of when I asked a cop in NM, “Who’s the injured party?” He answered, “The State of New Mexico.” I laughed out loud and the look on his face indicated that he realized how idiotic he sounded. We are also tricked into believing that God told us, in the Bible, to “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Fiction! In Luke 6:31, Jesus says something to that effect which refers back to Matthew 7:12 which refers back to Leviticus 19:18 which ends with “I am the LORD”. Even Jesus admits, “….which is the law and the prophets”; what does that mean? Is Jesus an agent of LORD God or Creator God? The alleged “golden rule” was not God’s law, as everyone thinks, because God made NO laws. All the “laws” in the Bible were made by LORD God––yes, the egotistical, angry, vengeful, jealous, and insane God about whom the entire Bible is written, except for the first chapter of Genesis. Another way to look at that absurd piece of propaganda is that perverts, masochists, and severely-indoctrinated Roman Catholics, with their notions of self-flagellation (not to mention all the other rituals to which these automatons adhere), would agree with that. They would love to be able to do unto others as they would, no doubt, just love to have another do unto them. What insanity! The point of that quotation––or, for that matter, any of the Ten Commandments given by LORD God–– is NOT to have us treat one another kindly; otherwise it would say so. That point is for the controllers–– in their allegiance to LORD God, not Creator God–– to have yet one more ‘law’ by which to control us. Remember it was they who edited the Bible for their agenda which was and still is all about controlling us. So, there can never be an “injured party”, in any court case, even when an injured party (man/woman) really does exist. Proof of this is when we truly have been injured by the public and so we file a suit against them. Do we prevail in court? They also know that their injury to a man has nothing to do with the court matter––the legal fiction name bringing the suit–– and the reason, for the very rare occasion when we might prevail, is only to prove the exception which is meant to confuse us into believing that there is some justice in the fraudulent justice system. The courts do not work for us; they work for ‘money’. They will never work for us until we find a way to force them to do their jobs as Public Servants. I feel certain that Dean Clifford has found a way to do so and this is by our knowing “who we are and who we are not”. Yes, what a tired-out cliché! Yet, his take on this is brilliant and he offers an innovative solution. Don’t miss him. Go to: freemanitoba/ and hear all episodes of his lectures (about 1/4 hour each). Also, hear his interview: youtube/watch?v=IaN3MpWnAFk He is a brave and brilliant young man. I’ll be posting summaries of his information. PS: For those of you who like to go to court to observe from the gallery, either to hear the deceit from a safe position or to support a friend in the hot seat, I have learned that even you in the gallery are “agents” of the matter because you are witnesses to the proceeding. Accordingly, you are in a position to protest the manner in which a proceeding is being carried out. When you hear a lie from the judge or the prosecutor (which is inevitable) you have the right––not to mention the DUTY––to stand up and say that you cannot witness any more of this Breach of Trust as you do not want to be held liable as a party to a Breach of Trust, so you will now be leaving. “Don’t say another word until I am gone as I do not want to be held liable as an acquiescing witness to the Breach of Trust being demonstrated in this proceeding.” Then, leave. Let me know what your friends report to you about what happens next. (smile) spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?paged=3
Posted on: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 02:14:09 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015