if u dont feel like reading all this u can watch this video it goes over the exact same process of challenging the courts jurisdiction. its pretty much the same thing i typed out below and it will be quite obvious that i studied this video very thorougly as i intend to try this method in court for an upcoming traffic citation and i needed to know word for word what i need to say and i wanted to have a complete understanding of what it was i was doing. this video was the begininng of my journey down the road to sovereignity & this has got to be the smartest frog in the world. :) https://youtube/watch?v=fa5lBNvaerk so the first thing u must know is that common law is not dead. common law applies to anybody who can prove that they operate under it & that must be done by first of all not giving them consent to try u in their fraudulent system, which means do not acknowledge any of their courtroom customs... when they announce the judge and ask that everybody rise... u must remain sitting. this is one tactic they use to get u to give them consent and you will not be reprimanded for not doing so. if they ask you why u did not stand inform them that their rules simply do not apply to you. https://youtube/watch?v=fa5lBNvaerk unless u have hurt somebody or damaged their property, yu have not broken the law so get that thru ur head first and foremost. if u dont believe it yourself u will never convince anybody else.... when the judge calls u to the stand he will ask u if u are john doe.... now anytime a court is requiring ur presence it is actually ur corporate fiction name that they are referring to & u must never admit to being that name they must get u to admit that you are john doe... in order for consent to be given. if they say are u blah blah blah john doe.... ur answer should be i am capital j lower case o lower case h lower case n... i am john doe the natural live person appearing on behalf of the fictional corporate name JOHN DOE. never refer to urself as a citizen. citizens have no rights. the judge will then ask u if u uderstand the nature of the charges against you & how do u wish to plea.... u have to let him know that you do not understand them & that u need to ask the court a few questions first. & whatever u do DONT enter a plea.. dont say not guilty , because as soon as u enter a plea u have givin them consent... tell the judge very politely that u need to ask some questions first before u enter a plea so that u can uderstand the nature n cause of the charges against u. your first question will be thank u ur honor, is this a court of record?? if he says yes (it usually is) then say thank you ur honor and is this going to be a criminal action or a civil action against me? he will respond criminal. you: thank u ur honor let the record show that this is going to be a criminal action against me. you: your honor the constitution allows 2 jurisdictions for criminal proceedings. one is criminal jurisdiction under common law, and the other is criminal jurisdiction under admiralty or military tribunal. which of these jurisdictios do u intend to try me your honor? now dont expect an easy answer to this question because you have just exposed the courts fraud. because the truth is that they are operating under admiralty law & the only way thats legal is if u have entered into a international contract across the sea but they cant tell u that... and he cant say common law because unless there is an injured party present, then you have not broken any laws, and they must dsmiss the charges. if they admit they are under admiralty law then u make a motion to dismiss the charges based on the fact that u did not enter into a international contract nor did u commit any commercial offenses on the sea, which is the only way u can legally be tried under this jurisdiction.... UNLESS YOU GIVE CONSENT by entering a plea!! at this point he may try to say that they are operating under stauatory jurisdiction in which case u will say you: i would be happy to accept that answer ur honor if u can tell me whre in the constitution i can find the written published rules for this jurisdiction and where this jurisdiction exists. the truth is that it doesnt exist. so at this point he may advise you to seek the assistance of a lic attorney for legal advice to which u will respnd you: thank you your honor but its not legal advice that im seeking but rather legal INTENT... you see the rules of criminal proceedings in a common law jurisdiction are very different from the rules of criminal jurisdiction under admiralty law, therefore it is imperative that i know which of these 2 jurisdictions u intend to try me & i dont think u would be viloating your oath of office if u did ur duty under the constitution... the constitution grants me the right to be informed of the jurisdiction that this court is operating under and it grants you the duty to inform me. is this court operating under a secret jurisdiction known only to lic attorneys? if he threatens you wth contempt of court you say: Your honor i do not wish to be held in contempt, im simply trying to establish which jurisdiction im being tried under and the constitution states that u cannot punish someone for excercising their constitutional rights. i make a motion that the charges be dismissed your honor on the grounds that this court has failed in its costitutional duty to inform me of the jurisdiction i will be tried under. at this point there is a very likely chance that he will be so frustrated that he will dismiss the case, if not he will move the case to a diffrent undisclosed date which will never actually come to pass and ur case may sit in limbo for eternity just floating in the ether. this has happened to people who have challenged the courts jurisdiction in which the magistrate is at a loss what to do so they do nothing they hide the case somewhere and its never heard from again
Posted on: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 07:14:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015