ok people the verdict is- IN - (ACT and OMISSIONS.) The moral distinction between acts and omissions amounts to the claim that there is a morally significant difference between a particular action and a corresponding failure to ACT, even though they have the same outcomes.Thus,it is said that there is a MORAL difference between, for -example-, LYING and NOT TELLING the TRUTH,hindering and failing to help,and between-*KILLING and LETTING DIE, even though, in each case, the consequences of the action and the OMISSION may be the SAME. One mite argue that moral requirements have the form of * Categorical Imperatives which prescribe what is to be done Regardless of what ones may want. ----OOOOH and lets not omit the faxed that Mike Brown was shot maul table times and left in the street for 4 hours(INCIDENTALLY.----(EYESOPEN)
Posted on: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 03:10:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015