over the past six seasons, chelsea have spent £108.4m and city - TopicsExpress



          

over the past six seasons, chelsea have spent £108.4m and city £180.65m more than united. looking at united as the most profitable club in england, it’s insane that the club has been allowed to, season by season, fall behind its’ competitors by keeping players beyond their peak, limiting academy player progression and not buying when they sell. it’s not ferguson, moyes or van gaal... keen for profit after interest, having bought the club by a debt that was eventually shifted to the club, this is an ownership problem, period! don’t expect much if the deadline closes before united secures a world class central midfielder (in the mold of vidal) and a central defender even if it is for the sake of adidas or chevrolet. Jude Okongo, Joseph Ossiya, Kyezira Abdalla Abdeel, Welime Elly, Sam Wamae, Olwenyi Simon, Hajarah Nakajubi, Angella N Kajjubi, Ntongo M Sylivia, Alowo Claire, Cornard Onyango OC, Namakula Freda what is your say?
Posted on: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:25:54 +0000

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015