so here we go a simple straight forward answer to Evolutionists, that i can almost guarantee they will mis interpert and mis read. just like Dave young seems to do so often. Lets begin with this: Changing a fish that spend all of its life in the water into a creature that spends most of its life on land, would require more than simply changing the form or morphology of the ancestors as they evolved into the amphibian. there are some critically important changes that a fish would have to undergo to become an amphibian. These include: Water Balance, As the proto-amphibian moved from water to dry land, he would have suffered serious loss of water through mouth, lungs, and body surfaces. Significant changes had to occur in these organs and structures to minimize these losses. Sense Organs: How could a fish or the lleged proto-amphibian survive on land before his many sensory structures had undergone extensive reorganization in order to adapt o the physical and chemical differences between water and air? Now, keep in mind that each sense organ had to function correctly from the very first, each change had to occur in the right sequence and be coordianted with all others, and all of this had to take place via random or accidental changes or mutations of the genes. MANY OTHER important physiological changes would have had to take place to enable the nascent amphibian, or part-way amphibians, to survive on land.
Posted on: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 03:27:29 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015