the merits of her arguments are good ... if you know ... she were - TopicsExpress

the merits of her arguments are good ... if you know ... she were a diplomat ... but she is a lawyer ... and any mental illness argument or fugitive argument ... if you consider the breaches ... which she mentions in the most milk toast of ways ... well ... her arguments can be argued by a cheating ... opposition party ... and a judge could ... then ... say ... oh opposition takes the ... c-ache ... but when the argument shows perjury ... and set-up ... pretty much by all parties involved ... except defendant ... who shows no breach in presumption of competence ... simply shows ... breach from ... all other parties ... then you know in tandem with perjury comes the dubious .. and cant argue that fatal flaw either ... in considering the matters attached .... I videotaped in outrage when I first got this travesty ... after a quick over view ... now I have read it ... and as I said she would have been a great diplomat ... didnt concede anything ... just omitted the most relevant arguments ... so relevant in fact in fact ... that she never needed to do ... what she did which I must say ... were there no dirt from all the others ... and were the arguments she had all she had to work with ... I think it would have been a great job ... as it is it is pathetic! oh and not mine ... now I did note cause I have started the analysis of her work in detail ... that she left room in thebegining for ... how did she put it ... among other issues that might be raised in briefing ... but when would that be ... and when would the government have to respond to such might issues eh ... hmm ... yup ... tho I shall send out my ... analysis of this material ... and put in the additional missing arguments that cannot be assailed ... to assault and deny jury trial ... along with ... evidence ... authentic and authenticated ... evidence ... yup .. she sure was correct tho in saying based on the record available to the court at the time she ordered Sebastian to competency restoration services,, it was not only procedurally inappropriate but also substantively inappropriate to do so ... real inappropriate ... yeah real ... inappropriate ... and not thru negligence either ... considering all the facts ... yup there is another part of interest where she speaks of considering all the facts .... but that is for later ... work ... if really needed ... already ... major and fatal flaws ... oozing out from every ... record ... and ewwww nnn oh ... not my dirt! she would have made a good diplomat say in international law ... at the un... but I think ms parks ... well ... from my perspective ... diplomatically speaking ... I want unconditional surrender! it is a safety matter ... among other things ... like nets worth ... finding ... and the good news ... is the law books she quotes ... with ok arguments I can quote with unassailable ... and considering the poisons used ... to deny jury trial and evidence ... one should be able to understand my unequivocal ... position ... in martial arts you could call it mountain stance .... and if you want to climb this one ... be prepared to cross ... you know ... boulder fields ... waiting for a misstep ... and you know ... avalanche ... that is called a posted trespass ... notice ... in mountain stance ... speak ... is that bizarre ... try getting in a ring and sea nnnn gg! oh yeah ... you could ask a Korean martial artist ... what the mountain stance symbolizes ... could even ask him to show you ... but to know you have to be in tune with ... duh force ... and there are many but only one ... higher power ... course that includes sky stance and black holes ... you know if you want to get metaphysical ... I just have facts to prove in court and laws to cite ... for you know best argument ... mountain wise! or in reasoning you know ... I q: u ... hmm ... and duh eh ... taches ahhhhh .... hi kk ss --- I just wonder how the chief judge at the appeals court is going to handle this ... now that you know ... correlated on facebook coram paribus ... style ... ill ... so what about that rule 902 ... chief ... and what about that continuing duty to disclose ... like such things as ... indeed not dubious ... and not to be twisted but that the evidence like the evidence regading the shrink ... is exactly what you know for authentication reasons ... it is evidence sufficient to support a finding that theitem is what the proponent claims it is ... rule 901 a ... in of course federal rules of evidence ... shall we look again at what the shrink got .. what she discussed what I discussed with her ... thru deposition ... cause the chief judge I think should know ... if he thinks his ... paid by gov ... shrink ... is fatally flawed ... in such fashion as to fatally destroy another person in his rights at minimum ... you know ... real horrors only have use ... for real horrible ... purposes ... and where does ... that ... hmm emeanate in proximate cause terms ??? that is also a question many might want answered ... like how long the woman has been on the job ... and how many did she ... do???? no I sure am glad I am not that prevericaing shrink right now ... course pseudo ... in realtiy ... no real