माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने जिस अधिकारी के लिए अपने पारित निर्णय में निम्न शब्द लिखे हो और वो फिर भी अपने पद पर बना रहे, राज्य के मुख्यमंत्री की इससे बड़ी बेशर्मी और क्या हो सकती है....ऐसे अधिकारियों और नेताओं से कैसे हम निष्पक्षता की उम्मीद कर सकते हैं ? 19. The Principal Secretary to the Water Supply Department is the Chairman of the Nigam. He was respondent No. 3 to the Writ Petition and is respondent No. 3 in this Civil Appeal. He was fully aware of the charge sheets pending against the respondent No. 4. In fact he had signed the same. It was his duty and responsibility to place these charge sheets before the Selection Committee of which he was a member. If the Secretary of the department suppresses the relevant material, obviously the selection will not be on merit. This in fact raises a serious doubt about the integrity of the then Chairman of the Nigam. In the circumstances we expect the respondent No. 1 State of Uttrakhand to hold appropriate inquiry as to why the Chairman of the Nigam did not place the relevant material before the Selection Committee and take necessary corrective measure. (IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7706 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.30361/2012) BHAJAN SINGH Appellant(s) :VERSUS: STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Respondent(s) August 27, 2013.
Posted on: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 07:29:04 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015