ఇండీపెండెంట్ సినిమా ,ఆర్టు సినిమా,షార్టు సినిమా.. ఏ సినిమా అయినా అర్థవంతమయితేనే బ్రదరూ ..లేదంటే ఉప్పు ఊరగాయకి కూడా పనికిరాదు... Since all art is communication, there can be nothing more viciously contradictory than the idea of nonobjective art. Anyone who wants to communicate with others has to rely on an objective reality and on objective language. The â nonobjectiveâ • is that which is dependent only on the individual subject, not on any standard of outside reality, and which is therefore incommunicable to others. When a man announces that he is a nonobjective artist, he is saying that what he is presenting cannot be communicated. Why then does he present it, and why does he claim that it is art? A nonobjective artist, whether a painter or a writer, is counting on the existence of objective artâ and using it in order to destroy it. Take a nonobjective painter. He creates some blobs of paint and proclaims that they are an expression of his subconscious, that they cannot be defined in any other terms, and that either you understand their meaning or you do not. Then he hangs them in a gallery. What does his work have in common with real art, which by definition represents recognizable physical objects? Only that it is hung on a wall. He has switched the definition of painting to â a piece of canvas in a frame.â • The art world laughed at the first nonobjective paintingsâ and today such stuff is practically all that is produced. The result is the destruction of art as a meaningful activity. The field has been taken over by a self-appointed elite of mystics who are playing a game to delude those with money enough to buy their products. But their basic purpose is not material; it is to establish an unearned artistic aristocracy. (The same purpose was served by Tooheyâ s clubs in The Fountainhead.) They want to make the practice of artistic creation available to anyone [regardless of ability], so that they can form their own little caste of specialists and pronounce, subjectively, what is and is not art. Then they can go around fooling each other and those who wish to support them. In the field of literature, the nonobjective has not yet been accepted fully; but the elements of reasonâ and, therefore, of real artâ are growing rarer and rarer in present-day writing. If the trend is not stopped, literature will follow the path of painting (and of all other aspects of our civilization). The best-known example of a nonobjective writer is Gertrude Stein, who combines words into sentences without any grammatical structure or meaning. She is still to some extent laughed at, but people.are laughing rather respectfully; their implied attitude is: â Well, sheâ s strange, but her writing is probably deep.â • Why is it deep? â Because I, the reader, cannot understand it.â • (The subjectivism of the audience of nonobjective art is based on an inferiority complex which takes the form: â If I donâ t understand it, it must be profound.â •) A writer who is not laughed at, but taught in universities as something very serious, is James Joyce. He is worse than Gertrude Stein; going all the way to the ultimate in nonobjective writing, he uses words from different languages, makes up some words of his own, and calls that literature. When communication by means of language is discarded, what is left as the definition of writing? Writing becomes inarticulate sounds printed on paper by means of certain black marks. - అయాన్-ర్యాండ్ ( aynrand - Art of fiction) Chinnagadu Filmmaker Undefineddefinition
Posted on: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 02:26:40 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015