ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﺪﺍﯼ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﺳﻼﻡ ... ﻟﻄﻔﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺫﯾﻞ ﺭﻭ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﮐﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﯾﻨﺪ .. ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻗﺖ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺁﮐﺎﺩﻣﯽ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﯾﮑﺴﺎﻝ ﭘﯿﺶ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »: ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﯽ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ « ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻢ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺳﺎﯾﺖ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﮔﺸﺖ. ﺍﺧﯿﺮﺍ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺧﺒﺮﯼ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﮔﺮﺩﯾﺪ، ﻭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﯼ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﯼ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻧﺸﯿﻨﯿﻢ. ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻨﯿﺪﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﯽ ﺩﺳﺘﺒﺮﺩ ﺁﮐﺎﺩﻣﯽ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﯼ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ، ﻓﺸﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﯼ ﺍﺯ ﺑﯿﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﯽ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﻟﯿﻔﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺫﮐﺮ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ : ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻲ ﺭﺿﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ 26 ﺩﻱﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ 1326 ﺷﻤﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ، ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﮔﺸﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺳﺎﻝ 1340 ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻗﻢ ﻋﺰﻳﻤﺖ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻀﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ: ﺩﺭﻭﺱ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ، ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﻔﺘﺢ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ . ﻓﻘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﺳﺐ ﺭﺍﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻀﺮ ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻓﺎﺿﻞ ﻟﻨﻜﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺱ »ﺧﺎﺭﺝ « ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﺩ، ﻭ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻼﺱ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﮔﻠﭙﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻲ، ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﯽ ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻣﻠﻜﻮﺗﻲ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻣﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﺳﻦ 19 ﺳﺎﻟﮕﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ » ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ « ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﻔﺘﺢ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﭖ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ . ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻲ ﺭﺿﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ 24 ﺟﻠﺪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺍﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﻟﯿﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ: ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ 2) ﺟﻠﺪ ( ، ﻣﻀﺎﺭﻋﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻀﺎﺭﺑﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ، ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ، ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺳﻮﺭﻩ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ، ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ، ﻧﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ، ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ، ﮔﺬﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ، ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺘﺎﺕ ) 4 ﺟﻠﺪ (، ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻓﻘﻬﻲ، ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ، ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺣﻜﻤﺖ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻴﻪ، ﻣﺤﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺋﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﺼﻮﺹ : ) 2 ﺟﻠﺪ(، ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭼﯿﺴﺘﯽ ﺯﯾﺒﺎﯾﯽ، ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺕ 1 ) ﺩﺭ ﺍﺣﮑﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ( ، ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺕ 2 ) ﻭﯾﮋﮔﯽ ﻫﺎﯼ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺨﻤﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻘﻪ (، ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺕ 3 ) ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﻣﺘﻌﻪ (، ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺕ 4 ) ﺳﯿﺮ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻭﺿﻮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﯿﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺖ (، ﻣﮑﺘﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﯾﻨﺪ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻤﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺨﯽ، ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻴﻪ )ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 10 ﺟﻠﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭼﺎﭖ (، ﺗﺤﺰﺏ ) ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭼﺎﭖ .( ﯾﮏ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﯼ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ – ﺁﯾﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﯼ ﺯﺍﺋﯿﺪﻩ ﯾﮏ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ ﺍﺳﺖ - » ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﯽ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ « ﺩﺭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻭ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﯼ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ 17 ﺍﺭﺩﯾﺒﻬﺸﺖ 1385ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﭼﻨﯿﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﻭ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﻧﻈﺮﯼ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺗﺮﺩﯾﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﮐﻨﻢ . ﺑﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺗﻮﺿﯿﺢ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻦ ﯾﮑﯽ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﺠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﻧﻈﺮﯼ ﺳﺎﻟﻬﺎ ﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺍﺑﺘﮑﺎﺭﯼ ﺁﯾﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ » ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ « ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺷﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻓﮑﺮﯼ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﯾﺸﻤﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﯾﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﮐﺜﯿﺮ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ. ﺩﻗﯿﻘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﯾﮑﺸﻨﺒﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ 1376 – ﺑﯿﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻓﻮﺭﯾﻪ 1998 ﻣﯿﻼﺩﯼ ﺩﺭ ﭘﯽ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺧﺒﺮﯼ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ » ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺟﺪﯾﺪﯼ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﯿﺪﺍﯾﺶ ﮐﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ « ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺒﺮ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﯼ ﺭﻭﯾﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ، ﺩﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﯿﺴﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻬﺎﯼ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻧﯿﻞ ﺗﻮﺭﻭﮎ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ » ﮐﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ ﭘﯿﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭﯼ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺩﺭ 12 ﻣﯿﻠﯿﺎﺭﺩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﯾﮏ ﻧﺨﻮﺩ ﺑﯿﺶ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ « ، ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﯿﺲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ )ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﯼ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪ( ﺗﺎﮐﯿﺪ ﮐﺮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﯿﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻭﯼ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﯿﺴﯽ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ) ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1372 ﭼﺎﭖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺩﯾﮕﺮ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﯾﯽ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ( ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ. ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﮔﻼﯾﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪ ﻣﺬﮐﻮﺭ ، ﮐﻪ ﻋﯿﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮐﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﮑﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ، ﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﯿﻨﯽ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﯾﮕﺮ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ » ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ « ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺿﯿﺢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﯾﮏ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﯼ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﯿﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ . ﺍﮐﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﻗﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﻣﺬﮐﻮﺭ ، ﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﯿﻨﯽ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﯽ ﭘﺬﯾﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ » ﺁﯾﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﯼ ﺯﺍﺋﯿﺪﻩ ﯾﮏ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ ﺍﺳﺖ « ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺼﺤﻪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﯽ ﺭﺳﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﮐﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﮐﺴﺎﻧﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﮑﻮﻡ ﻣﯽ ﮐﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﯾﮏ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻧﯽ ﮐﺠﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ﮐﺠﺎ ، ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﻋﻠﯽ ﺭﻏﻢ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺣﻀﺮﺍﺕ ، ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪﯼ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ » ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﺍﻋﻈﻤﯽ « ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﯾﺎﺭﯼ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﯿﻤﺎﯼ ﺑﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﺮﺯﯼ ﺯﻣﯿﻨﻪ ﯾﮏ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻭﻗﻔﻪ ﺍﯼ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻡ ﭘﺮﻭﮊﻩ ﭘﯿﺪﺍﯾﺶ ﮐﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺍﯾﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ. ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﯾﻨﮏ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻧﯿﻞ ﺗﻮﺭﻭﮎ ﻫﻤﮑﺎﺭ ﺩﯾﺮﯾﻦ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﻭﻓﺴﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﯾﻨﻬﺎﺭﺕ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺘﮑﺎﺭﯼ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺟﺎﯼ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﯾﻐﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ. ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﯾﮑﺴﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﯽ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﯾﻞ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﯽ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﯽ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﯿﻢ. ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﺸﮑﺮ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺎﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺗﺨﺼﯿﺺ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺧﻮﯾﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺳﺘﺒﺮﺩ ﻭ ﯾﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻗﯿﻘﺘﺮ ﺳﺮﻗﺖ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺁﮐﺎﺩﻣﯽ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺿﯿﺤﺎﺗﯽ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﯾﯿﺪ: ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﯾﺪ ﮐﻤﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﯾﻢ: ﻧﺰﺩﯾﮏ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻢ ﺭﺳﯿﺪﻡ، ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺮﯾﺸﺎﻥ، ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ، ﺑﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﻋﻮﺍﺭﺽ ﺟﺴﻤﯽ ﻓﺮﺩ ﮐﻢ ﻃﺎﻗﺘﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺎﻫﯽ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻏﺶ ﻣﯽ ﺭﻭﻡ . ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭ ﭘﯿﮑﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﺭﮎ ﮐﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﭽﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﯾﺪﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺪﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﯾﺪﺍﺭ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ . ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺪﺭ ﺳﻼﻡ ﮐﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻮﺳﯿﺪﻡ. ﻣﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻭﻗﺘﯽ ﺩﺳﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﯽ ﺑﻮﺳﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﮔﯿﺮﯼ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ . ﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﮐﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ : - ﺑﺎﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ؟ - ﭼﯿﺰﯼ ﻧﯿﺴﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﻡ. - ﻣﯽ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻤﺖ ﺑﮕﻮ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﯿﻢ -؟ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺟﺮﯾﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﮐﺮﺩ: ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﻓﻄﺎﺭ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﯽ، ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺳﺮ ﺟﺎﯾﺶ ﻣﯽ ﺁﯾﺪ. ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﮕﻮ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺧﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﻩ ﻫﺎﯾﺶ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ. ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮐﻨﺎﺭﯼ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻧﺎ ﺩﯾﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ . ... ﺧﻮﺏ، ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﮕﻮ ﺑﺒﯿﻨﻢ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ - ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﮐﻪ ﭼﯿﺰﯼ ﻧﯿﺴﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ . - ﻣﯽ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻤﺖ، ﺣﺎﻻ ﮐﻪ ﯾﮏ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﻄﺎﺭﺕ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﯾﺎﯼ ﻏﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﯽ. ﮔﻔﺘﻢ: ﯾﮏ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﺷﻪ ﺁﻧﻢ. - ﺑﺎﺯ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺍﯼ؟ - ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻠﻮﺯﯾﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﺮﺯﯼ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ »ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ .« ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﯿﻢ ﺳﭙﺲ ﻣﯽ ﺭﻭﯾﻢ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺑﺒﯿﻨﯿﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻣﯽ ﮔﻮﯾﺪ. ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﯿﺎ ﻣﺮﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ . ﺳﯿﻤﺎﯼ ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﭘﯿﺮ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻨﯿﺪﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﻢ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺤﻦ ﺗﻮﺑﯿﺦ ﺁﻣﯿﺰ ﮔﻔﺖ: ﻣﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﺩﯾﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ، ﺭﺍﺩﯾﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﺯﯾﻮﻥ ﻧﺮﻭﯼ؟ ﻣﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﮐﺎﺭﯼ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﯽ؟! ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﻗﯿﻘﺎ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺑﺪﻩ ﺑﺒﯿﻨﻢ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﭘﺪﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﭘﯿﭽﯿﺪﻩ ﮐﻼﻡ ﻭ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻤﺎﺭﺳﺖ ﮐﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ. ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 32 ﮐﻪ ﺷﺶ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ، ﮐﺎﺭﯾﮑﺎﺗﻮﺭﯼ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺮﺳﯿﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ : ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺷﯿﺸﻪ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺷﯿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻐﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺴﺘﺎﻧﮑﯽ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮﺵ. ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ) ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮐﻮﺩﮎ ﺭﻧﺠﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻧﺤﯿﻔﯽ ﺗﺮﺳﯿﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ( ﻣﯽ ﮔﻮﯾﺪ: ﻣﻤﻠﯽ ﺟﻮﻥ ﻟﻮﻟﻮ ﻣﻪ ﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ. ﺍﯾﻨﮏ ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﭘﺴﺮﺵ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﯿﻦ ﻣﺤﯿﻄﯽ ﺗﺮﺑﯿﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﻟﮕﯽ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﯽ ﻏﻮﻃﻪ ﻭﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ، ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﮑﺸﺪ . ﮐﺎﺭﯼ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻭ ﻏﯿﺮﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ . ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺮﯾﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﯼ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺷﺪ. ﭘﯿﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﻫﺎﯾﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ، ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻘﯿﻪ ﭼﺎﭖ ﻣﯽ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﯾﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﺯﯾﻮﻥ ﻧﯿﺰ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﯽ ﮔﺸﺖ . ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﯽ ﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮ ﮐﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﯾﮑﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﺎﯾﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺴﯽ ﺑﺰﻧﯿﻢ ! ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﺤﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﮊﯾﻤﯿﻨﺎﺳﺘﯿﮏ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﯾﺞ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻡ. ﯾﺎ » ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﯾﻢ « ، ﯾﮑﯽ ﺩﻭ ﻧﺸﺮﯾﻪ ﮐﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ 57 ﻣﯽ ﺍﻧﺪﯾﺸﯿﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻣﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﮑﺎﺭﯼ ﮐﻨﻢ. ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﺳﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ »ﻣﺸﺪ ﺍﻣﯿﺮ« ﺍﺯ ﺧﯿﺮ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﯿﻢ . ﯾﺎﺩﻡ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﮔﺮﺷﺎﺳﺒﯽ ﭘﺬﯾﺮﻓﺘﻢ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﯽ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻨﻮﯾﺴﻢ. ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺑﺮ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻃﻨﺰ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﯼ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺎﺭ، ﭼﻨﺪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﯾﺎﺩﻡ ﻫﺴﺖ « ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﯼ ﺷﻤﻊ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻢ . ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮﯼ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﯽ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﯿﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ، ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻡ. ﺳﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻃﻨﺰ ﻫﺎ ﮐﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻡ . ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﮔﺮﺷﺎﺳﺒﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺯﻧﮓ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﮐﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺑﺪﻫﻢ . ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺳﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﯾﮑﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻋﻤﻞ ﮐﻨﻢ . ﮔﻔﺖ ﭼﯿﺴﺖ؟ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻣﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻓﻼﻧﯽ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ : ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﻓﻼﻥ ﭼﯿﺰ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ، ﺩﺳﺘﮑﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﻇﺐ ﺑﺎﺷﯿﺪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﯾﮑﯽ ﮐﻪ . . . . ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﯿﻦ ﻧﺮﻭﺩ. ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﻠﯽ ﺷﻨﯿﺪﻩ ﺍﻡ. ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﭼﯿﺰﯼ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻡ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﯾﺪ: ﯾﺎﺩﻡ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﯽ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﯽ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺫﺭﺑﺎﯾﺠﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﺗﺎﻣﯿﻦ ﻣﯽ ﺷﺪ ﭼﻮﺑﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ، ﮔﻮﺳﻔﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﮐﺎﻣﯿﻮﻥ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺳﺮ ﮐﺎﻣﯿﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﯽ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻧﺪ. ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﺎﻭ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻭ ﻣﯿﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻤﻊ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻨﺎﺏ ﻣﯽ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﮔﻮﻥ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﯽ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﯿﺪﻧﺪ. ﻣﺸﺪ ﺍﻣﯿﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺑﯽ ﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎﯾﯽ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﺳﺖ ﺳﯿﺰﺩﻩ ، 13 ﮔﺎﻭﻣﯿﺶ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﮐﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺎﻭﻣﯿﺶ ﻫﺎ ﭼﻮﺏ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﯿﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻇﺒﺖ ﮐﻨﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﮐﻮﻫﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻫﺸﺘﺮﻭﺩ ﻣﯿﻠﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻗﻔﻞ ﺣﻔﺎﻅ ﻭﺍﮔﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﯼ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻭﯾﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ. ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﯾﺪ ﻧﺎﺷﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﮐﺖ ﮔﺎﻭﻣﯿﺶ ﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺏ ﻭ ﻭﺣﺸﯽ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ. ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺳﺮﯾﻊ ﮐﻮﻩ ﻭ ﺻﺨﺮﻩ ﭼﺸﻤﺸﺎﻥ ﮔﺸﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺷﺪﯾﺪﯼ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺎﻧﺎﻝ ﺑﯿﻨﯽ ﺷﺎﻥ ﻓﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ . ﺭﻡ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﯾﯿﻦ ﭘﺮﯾﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ . ﻣﺸﺪ ﺍﻣﯿﺮ ﭼﻮﺑﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺳﯿﻨﻪ ﮔﺎﻭﻣﯿﺶ ﻫﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﮐﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﯾﺪﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ. ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﮔﺎﻭﻣﯿﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺑﯿﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﯽ ﭘﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﯾﺶ ﻣﯽ ﺷﮑﻨﺪ. ﺩﻭﻣﯽ ، ﺳﻮﻣﯽ، ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻣﺸﺪ ﺍﻣﯿﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﮔﺎﻭﻣﯿﺶ ﺳﯿﺰﺩﻫﻢ. ﻓﮑﺮﯼ ﮐﺮﺩ، ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﯿﻤﺶ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪ. ﺍﺯ ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ ﺍﯾﻦ ﯾﮑﯽ ﻣﻨﺼﺮﻑ ﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺸﺖ ﮔﺎﻭ ﻣﯿﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻬﺎﯼ ﮔﺎﻭﻣﯿﺶ ﻫﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ : ﺑﺮﻭ، ﺑﺮﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺗﻮ ﺍﻣﯿﺮ، ﺍﻣﯿﺮ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ، ﻧﺨﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻧﯿﺰ ﭘﺮﯾﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ. ﺍﯾﻨﮏ ﻣﺸﺪ ﺍﻣﯿﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﮔﻮﻥ ﺑﯽ ﺣﻔﺎﻅ ﺗﺎ ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ ﯾﮏ ﺍﯾﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﭘﯿﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ . ﺣﺎﻻ ﮐﻪ ﻓﻼﻥ ﭼﯿﺰ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺑﯿﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺁﺧﺮﯼ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﺒﯿﻨﻢ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺠﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﯾﺴﺘﺎﺩ. ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﮔﺮﺷﺎﺳﺒﯽ، ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﮔﺎﻭﻣﯿﺶ ﺳﯿﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﯾﮕﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ . ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﭘﺪﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻠﻮﯾﺰﯾﻮﻥ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﯾﮏ ﺩﺭﮔﯿﺮﯼ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺑﺎ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺠﯽ ﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻠﻮﯾﺰﯾﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﺮﺯﯼ ﮐﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ . ﻣﺤﺘﻮﯼ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ »ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ « ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 56 ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﮐﺰ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﮑﺮﺭ ﺗﺪﺭﯾﺲ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ )ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ( ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮑﺪﻩ »ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺖ، ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ ﻭ ﺍﯾﻤﻨﯽ « ﺑﺠﺎﯼ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﯾﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ، ﺗﺪﺭﯾﺲ ﮐﺮﺩﻡ، ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﯿﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮑﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﯾﮋﻩ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﯼ ) ﺩﺍﺭﺍﯼ ﻣﺪﺭﮎ ﭘﯽ ﺍﭺ ﺩﯼ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ ( ﻭ ﺭﺋﯿﺲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮑﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﺪﺭﯾﺴﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺁﯾﺪ، ﻣﯽ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ : ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺰﻭﻩ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﻣﯽ ﺩﻫﯽ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ، ﺣﯿﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﯾﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﻗﺖ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﺎﭖ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ . ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﯿﻢ ﮐﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 72 ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﯿﻦ ﮐﺘﺎﺑﻢ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪ، ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﭘﯿﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﺼﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺪﺍﺗﯽ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺩﻧﯿﺎ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﮐﺴﯽ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻗﺖ ﮐﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ 9 ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺋﯽ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﺋﯽ ) ﻫﺮ ﮐﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺪ ( ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻢ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﯼ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﯼ ﮐﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻧﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﯼ، ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﺪ. ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﯼ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ، ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎﯾﻢ، ﮐﺮﺷﻠﯽ، ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﮐﺘﺒﯽ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺸﮑﺮ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﯾﮑﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﮐﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺟﻠﺪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻔﺮﺳﺘﯿﻢ )ﮐﭙﯽ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﮎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﺳﺎﯾﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.( ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ 1/12/1376 ، ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺗﻠﻮﯾﺰﯾﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﮐﺮﺩﻡ، ﯾﮏ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ »ﺳﺎﻧﺪﯼ ﺗﺎﯾﻤﺰ 22) ﻓﻮﺭﯾﻪ (1998 ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﯽ ﮐﺮﺩ : ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻧﯿﻞ ﺗﺮﻭﮎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﮐﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ «... ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﮕﯿﺮﯾﻢ،ﻓﺮﺩﺍﯼ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺗﻌﻄﯿﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﯼ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ ﺁﻥ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ، ﺩﯾﺪﻡ ﺩﻗﯿﻘﺎً ﺑﺨﺸﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﯽ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ. ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﯼ ﮐﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮑﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮑﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷﮑﯽ ﺑﻮﺩ، ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺗﻠﻔﻨﯽ ﮔﻔﺖ: ﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻓﮑﺮ ﻣﯽ ﮐﺮﺩﯾﻢ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪ. ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .... ﻋﺎﻗﺒﺖ ﮔﺮﮔﻢ ﺗﻮ ﺑﻮﺩﯼ، ﮔﻔﺖ ﻓﻮﺭﺍً ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﮐﻦ، ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺩﺭﯾﺎﻓﺖ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻮﯾﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺮﻭﮎ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺺ ﺩﺭ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ »ﺫﺭّﻩ ﺍﯼ « ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺺ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﯼ. ﺑﺎ ﭘﯿﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻮﯾﻖ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻧﯽ ﭼﻨﺪ ﭘﯽ ﮔﯿﺮﯼ ﮐﺮﺩﯾﻢ، ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻣﯽ ﮐﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮﺍﺗﯽ ﮐﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﯼ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮑﺪﻩ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻥ )ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﺋﯽ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ( ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﯽ ﻧﻔﻬﻤﯽ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﮑﻮﻡ ﻣﯽ ﮐﺮﺩﻧﺪ : ﻧﻤﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺠﯽ ﻫﺎ ﻧﯿﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﯾﮏ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻧﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ، ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﻤﮑﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﺎ ﮐﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﯾﺪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺩﺭﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ. ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﯿﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺁﻗﺎﯾﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﯽ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﮐﻦ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺭﺳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﯿﺎﻥ؛ ﻣﯽ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺁﻗﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎً ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﯽ ﻭ ﻧﯿﺰ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﻧﻈﺮﯼ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻗﺘﯽ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﺿﯿﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺴﻖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺴﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ، ﻣﯽ ﮔﻮﯾﻢ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﺸﻒ ﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ، ﺳﺨﻦ ﺧﺪﺍ، ﺳﺨﻦ ﻋﻠﯽ) ﻉ ( ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ) ﻉ( ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﻧﻈﺮﯼ ﺟﺎﺭﯼ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺠﺎ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﮐﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﻧﻈﺮﯼ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻧﯽ ﻣﯽ ﮔﻮﯾﻢ : »ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﯽ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻭﻗﺘﯽ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﺎ ﺣﻞ ﺷﺪ ﺁﺳﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﯽ ﮔﯿﺮﺩ ﺻﺤﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﯽ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﮔﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎﯼ ﺗﺎﺑﻨﺎﮎ ﻣﯽ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺪ .« ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺁﻣﯿﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﯿﺲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﺪ. ) ﻣﺘﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﯾﺮ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ( ﺭﻭﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﯽ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﯾﮑﯽ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﯼ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ 14/12/1376 ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭼﺎﭖ ﮐﺮﺩ، ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺑﻘﯿﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮐﻢ ﺑﯿﻨﯽ) ﻣﮕﺮ ﻣﻤﮑﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ﻧﯿﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﯾﮏ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻧﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ( ﭼﺎﭖ ﻧﮑﺮﺩﻧﺪ . ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﯾﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ، ﻭﻗﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﯾﺪﺍﺭ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻭﺯﯾﺮ ﮐﻪ ﭘﺰﺷﮏ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﻓﺘﯿﻢ، ﻭﻗﺘﯽ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﯾﺶ ﺗﻮﺿﯿﺢ ﻣﯽ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ 000/000/250/18 ﺳﺎﻝ ﯾﺎ 000/750/668/13 ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﯿﺎﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻡ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻭﺯﯾﺮ ﮔﻔﺖ: ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﻮﺭﯼ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﮔﻔﺘﻢ: ﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﺳﺎﻟﻬﺎﯼ ﮐﺮﻩ ﺯﻣﯿﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﻮﺭﯼ »ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺖ « ﺍﺳﺖ، ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﮑﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ، ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﯿﺴﺖ. ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﮐﺮﺍﺕ ﯾﺎ ﮐﻬﮑﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ، ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﺳﺎﻟﻬﺎﯼ ﺯﻣﯿﻨﯽ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ . ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻭﺯﯾﺮ ﮐﻪ ﭘﺰﺷﮏ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﯽ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ، ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﮐﺮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻤﯽ ﻓﻬﻤﻢ، ﺍﻫﻤﯿﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺑﯿﻦ ﺭﻓﺖ ﮔﻮﺋﯽ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﯽ ﺍﻧﺪﯾﺸﯿﺪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺁﻗﺎ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﯼ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﺋﯽ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ . ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﻭﺯﯾﺮ ﻣﺄﯾﻮﺱ ﺷﺪﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﯿﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﯾﮏ ﺁﻗﺎﺋﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺭﺋﯿﺲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮑﺪﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﺮ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﺮ ﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ : ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺪﯾﺚ ﻣﯽ ﮔﻮﯾﺪ ﺁﻗﺎﯾﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻭﮎ ﻭ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﯽ ﺑﺮ ﻣﯽ ﮔﯿﺮﻧﺪ، ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩ، ﺩﯾﺪﻡ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺭﺋﯿﺲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮑﺪﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﺮ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎً ﻧﻤﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﻧﻈﺮﯼ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﯽ، ﺳﺮ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺗﺮﻭﮎ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺫﺭّﻩ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ. ﭘﺪﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﯾﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ، ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺑﯿﻌﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺩﺭﮔﯿﺮﯼ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﯿﺴﯽ ﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﺎ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻪ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺗﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻃﺎﻋﺘﺎً ﻻﻣﺮﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﮐﻪ ﻗﻀﯿﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻢ. ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﯽ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ﮐﺮﺩ . ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﯾﮏ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ، ﺗﻠﻔﻦ ﺯﻧﮓ ﺯﺩ: ﺍﻟﻮ ﺑﻠﯽ: ﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﯿﮑﻢ. ﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﻈﻤﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻠﻮﯾﺰﯾﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﺮﺯﯼ، ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻣﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﯿﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺠﯽ ﻫﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﯿﻢ. ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﻨﺶ ﭘﯿﺪﺍ ﺑﻮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺩﯾﮕﺮﯼ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﮐﺴﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﮐﻪ ﻻﺑﺪ ﺩﺭ ﯾﮑﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻏﺮﺏ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺩﮐﺘﺮﯼ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻡ. ﮔﻔﺘﻢ: ﻣﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﯿﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﯾﮏ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻡ، ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﯿﺖ )ﻉ ( ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻡ. ﮔﻔﺖ: ﺑﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻣﯽ ﺭﺳﯿﻢ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺣﺎﻓﻆ. ﺑﺎ ﺷﻨﯿﺪﻥ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﺳﯽ ﮐﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﻗﯿﻘﺎً ﭘﺸﯿﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ. 20 ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺯﻧﮓ ﺯﺩ: ﺑﺒﺨﺸﯿﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻈﻤﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻠﻮﯾﺰﯾﻮﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ، ﻣﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﻭﻗﺘﯽ ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ ﮐﻨﯿﺪ، ﺗﺸﺮﯾﻒ ﺑﯿﺎﻭﺭﯾﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ. ﮔﻔﺘﻢ: ﺷﻤﺎ ﮐﻪ ﭘﺸﯿﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﯾﺪ. ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﯾﻨﮑﻪ ﭘﺸﯿﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﮑﺎﺭ ﮐﻨﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ : ﻗﻀﯿﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺩ. ﻓﺮﺩﺍﯼ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻡ ﺟﻢ ﺭﻓﺘﻢ، ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﯿﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﭘﯿﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ : ﺑﻠﯽ ﻣﺎ ﭘﺸﯿﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﯾﻢ ﻭ ﻓﮑﺮ ﻣﯽ ﮐﺮﺩﯾﻢ ﮐﺴﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﺤﺼﯿﻼﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﯽ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺩﯼ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ . ﻣﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﯿﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭘﯿﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﯾﮏ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﮐﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺍﻋﻈﻤﯽ ﻭ ﻣﻘﯿﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﯾﻢ ﺳﭙﺲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﯾﮕﺎﻧﯽ ﮐﺮﺩﯾﻢ ، ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺍﻋﻈﻤﯽ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﭘﯽ ﮔﯿﺮﯼ ﮐﺮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﭼﻪ ﮐﺮﺩﯾﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ؟ ﮔﻔﺘﯿﻢ : ﺍﯾﻦ ﺁﻗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﯾﮏ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﯽ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺼﯿﻼﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﯽ ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ، ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﮔﻔﺖ : ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺵ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﯾﮏ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﯽ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﯽ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﯿﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﮐﻤﮏ ﮐﻨﯿﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺣﻘﺶ ﺿﺎﯾﻊ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ . ﺑﺎﻻ ﺧﺮﻩ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﯾﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﯾﻨﮏ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺪﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﯽ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ . ﮔﻔﺖ: ﻣﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﭘﯽ ﮔﯿﺮﯼ ﻧﮑﻨﯽ، ﺭﻓﺘﯽ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻫﻢ ﮐﺮﺩﯼ، ﺍﻧﮕﯿﺰﻩ ﺍﺕ ﭼﯿﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻗﯿﻤﺘﯽ ﻣﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﯽ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﯿﺮﯼ . ﮔﻔﺘﻢ: ﻧﻤﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪ ﻧﯿﺘﻢ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﯾﮏ ﻓﮑﺮ ﻫﻤﯿﺸﻪ ﻭﺟﺪﺍﻧﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺭ ﻣﯽ ﺩﻫﺪ، ﻓﮑﺮ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﮑﺘﺐ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ) ﻉ( ﺟﻔﺎ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺳﺎﺭﻗﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﯾﻐﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ، ﺍﯾﻦ ﻓﮑﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺭﻧﺠﻢ ﻣﯽ ﺩﻫﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ: ﺍﮔﺮ ﮐﺎﺭﺕ ﻗﺮﺑﺔً ﺍﻟﯽ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ، ﻧﺒﺎﯾﺪ ﭼﻨﯿﻦ ﻓﮑﺮﯼ ﺁﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﻫﺪ. ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻧﯿﺖ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﯼ ﭘﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﯽ؟ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ: ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺯﻧﮓ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﻬﺪﯾﺪﻡ ﮐﺮﺩﻧﺪ. ﺭﻧﮓ ﭘﺪﺭﻡ ﺳﺮﺥ ﺷﺪ، ﺗﺮﺳﯿﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ، ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻟﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﯽ ﺳﻮﺯﺩ، ﺁﺩﻡ ﺗﺮﺳﻮﺋﯽ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﯿﺲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﯿﺴﯽ ﻫﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﻋﺐ ﺍﻧﮕﯿﺰﯼ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ. ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺩﺭ ﮐﻨﺎﺭ ﭘﺪﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺣﮑﻢ ﺷﺮﻋﯽ ﮐﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﻗﻀﯿﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﯽ ﮔﯿﺮﯼ ﮐﻨﻢ. ﭘﺪﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 6/12/77 ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﻡ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 86 ، ﺗﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﮐﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺍﯾﻨﮏ ﺷﺮﻋﺎً ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻧﯿﺰ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﺷﺼﺖ ﻭ ﯾﮏ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ. ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻧﯿﻞ ﺗﺮﻭﮎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻧﺪﯼ ﺗﺎﯾﻤﺰ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺘﺎﺑﯽ ﮐﻪ ﻣﯽ ﻧﻮﯾﺴﺪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﯿﺎﻭﺭﺩ. ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﯿﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﮐﻤﮏ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﺍﻋﻈﻤﯽ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﮔﺸﺖ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺶ ﺧﻮﺩﺍﺭﯼ ﮐﻨﺪ، ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ » ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﺩﻭ« ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﮐﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ) ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ، ﺑﻞ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﮑﺘﺐ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ) ﻉ -( .( ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺑﺎﯾﺪ ﺑﻪ ﯾﮏ ﻧﮑﺘﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﮐﻨﻢ: ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻧﺪﯼ ﺗﺎﯾﻤﺰ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﯿﻞ ﺗﺮﻭﮎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ، ﻣﻤﮑﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﯽ ﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﮑﺬﯾﺐ ﻧﮑﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﯾﻨﮑﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺶ ﺧﻮﺩﺍﺭﯼ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻭﻟﯽ ﺣﻀﺮﺍﺕ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﻫﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﯿﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺯﯾﺮ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﺋﯿﺪ: -1 ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﺍﻑ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ، ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺕ. ﭘﺎﺩﻣﺎﻧﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﯿﻦ ﺳﻪ ﺩﻗﯿﻘﻪ، ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﯿﮓ ﺑﻨﮓ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ 000/000/700/13 ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﯽ ﮔﺬﺭﺩ، ﯾﻌﻨﯽ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻧﺪﺭ ﮐﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﻣﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﭼﻨﯿﻦ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺩﻗﯿﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﯿﻄﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﯽ ﻋﻠﻢ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﭘﯿﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﮐﻪ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﺭﻗﻤﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺮﺍﮐﺰ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﯽ ﺷﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺸﺖ ﻣﻠﯿﺎﺭﺩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﺎ ﺑﯿﺴﺖ ﻣﯿﻠﯿﺎﺭﺩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﯾﻌﻨﯽ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ »ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ « ﻣﺒﺘﻨﯽ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻﺗﯽ ﺑﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺯﯾﺎﺩ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺕ. ﭘﺎﺩﻣﺎﻧﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺩﻗﯿﻖ 000/000/700/13 ﺭﺍ ﻣﯽ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﮔﻮﺋﯽ ﺩﺭ ﺯﯾﺮ ﺩﺭﺧﺖ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ﺑﺮﺍﯾﺶ ﻭﺣﯽ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. -2 ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﻧﯿﻞ ﺗﺮﻭﮎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﮑﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﻣﺎﯾﻮﺱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﭘﺮﻓﺴﻮﺭ ﭘﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﯾﻨﻬﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﮑﺎﺭﯼ ﺍﻭ ﻣﯽ ﮔﻮﯾﺪ ﺑﯿﮓ ﺑﻨﮓ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭘﯿﺸﯿﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﮐﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ . ﺗﺮﻭﮎ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭﺣﯽ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. -3 ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ »ﭘﻦ « ﻧﯿﺰ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ : » ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ، ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﯾﮕﺮﯼ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ « )ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ. 3/3/1385 .( ﺗﺮﻭﮎ ﺩﺭ ﮐﻨﺎﺭ ﭘﻞ ﻣﯽ ﮔﻮﯾﺪ: ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﮑﺮﺭ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺭﯾﺰﺵ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﯼ. ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻭ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﯼ . 17/2/1385 ( ﻭﺣﯽ ﺩﯾﮕﺮ. ﮐﺘﺎﺏ »ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ « ﺍﯾﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺁﻓﺮﯾﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. -4 ﺗﻠﻮﯾﺰﯾﻮﻥ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ، ﺷﺒﮑﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ، ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺭﺩﯾﻦ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ (1387) ﯾﮏ ﻓﯿﻠﻢ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﯽ ﮐﺮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﯾﺒﺎً ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻭ ﺁﻥ، ﺑﻪ ﯾﻐﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺩ. ﺑﻪ ﻭﯾﮋﻩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﯽ ﭘﺎﯾﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ . ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ: ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺳﺮﺳﺎﻡ ﺁﻭﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﺧﺮﺵ ﭼﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ؟ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺘﯽ ﺧﯿﻠﯽ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﯾﺠﺎﺏ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﯿﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﯼ ﭼﯿﺰﯼ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﺣﺘﯽ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﯼ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺘﯽ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﯽ ﺑﯿﻨﯿﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ، ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮐﻬﮑﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﮐﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ . ﺍﻧﯿﺸﺘﯿﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ: ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮ ﻣﻨﻘﺒﺾ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮐﻮﭼﮏ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺸﺖ . ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﯿﻔﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ ﮐﻪ ﻟﻘﺐ » ﭘﺪﺭ ﺳﯿﺎﻩ ﭼﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﺎ « ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﯿﺪ ﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﺳﯿﺎﻩ ﭼﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﻓﯿﻠﻢ ﻣﺬﮐﻮﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﮔﺸﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻘﺒﺾ ﻧﻤﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻞ ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ. ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺳﯿﺎﻩ ﭼﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﺏ ﺑﻨﻔﺶ ﺗﺒﺪﯾﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ . ﺩﻗﯿﻘﺎً ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﯽ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﺬﮐﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﯿﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ »ﮔﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﺭﻏﻮﺍﻧﯽ « ﺗﻌﺒﯿﺮ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ. ﺍﺻﻞ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻣﻦ، ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﻘﺒﺾ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﯿﺎﻩ ﭼﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻠﻌﯿﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ )ﺳﯿﺎﻩ ﭼﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ( ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺑﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺷﺪﻧﺶ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ . ﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ »ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ« ﻏﻠﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻞ ﮐﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﯽ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﯿﺸﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮐﺰ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﯼ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ »ﺍﯾﺠﺎﺩ « ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ . ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ، ﻧﯿﺰ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺭﺑﻄﯽ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ. -5 ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﯽ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻪ ﻣﯽ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺻﺤﯿﺢ ﻭ ﺯﯾﺒﺎﯼ ﻣﮑﺘﺐ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ) ﻉ ( ﭼﺸﻢ ﭘﻮﺷﯽ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻣﯽ ﺑﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﮑﺘﺐ ﺑﭙﺬﯾﺮﻧﺪ. ﺯﯾﺮﺍ ﺳﯿﺼﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻮﺷﯿﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﯿﺖ ﺭﺍ )ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﯿﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﯽ( ﺩﻓﻦ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﯾﻨﮏ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ. ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﺒﮑﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ »ﺁﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺯﺑﯿﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻤﻨﺎ ﮐﻨﺪ « ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺧﻮﺩﯼ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻏﺮﺑﯿﺎﻥ ﭘﺨﺶ ﮐﻨﺪ. ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺴﮏ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﯿﺖ) ﻉ ( ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﻭ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻋﻮﺽ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺣﻘﯿﻘﺖ ﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺗﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﺯﯾﺮﺍ ﺧﻮﺭﺷﯿﺪ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻤﯽ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﯿﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﯼ ﮐﻪ ﻃﻼﺏ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﯾﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ » ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ « ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﯿﻮﻥ ﯾﻮﻧﺎﻧﯿﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﺍﺋﯿﺎﺕ ﻣﺼﻮﻥ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ. ﻭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ . ﮐﭙﯽ )ﻋﮑﺲ ( ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﮎ ﺑﻪ ﭘﯿﻮﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﯾﺖ ﺑﯿﻨﺶ ﻧﻮ ) binesheno.c om( ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﯽ ﮔﯿﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﯾﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺼﻒ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ. ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﭘﺎﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﭖ »ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ« ﻫﯿﭻ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺟﺪﯾﺪﯼ ﺩﺭ ﮐﯿﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﻧﻈﺮﯼ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﻧﯿﺎﻣﺪﻩ ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺁﻥ ﺑﯿﻔﺰﺍﺋﯿﺪ؟ - ﭼﺮﺍ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﯾﮕﺮ ﻫﺴﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎﯾﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﯿﻦ ﻣﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﯿﻞ: -1 ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ »ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﯿﻮﺗﻮﻥ« ﻧﺎﻗﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺣﺘﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎً ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺍﻧﯿﺸﺘﯿﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻧﯿﺰ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﯾﮑﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﮕﯿﺰﻩ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺍﻧﯿﺸﺘﯿﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ »ﺍﻧﺤﻨﺎ« ﺑﻮﺩ ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﺍﻭ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﯾﮏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﮐﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻧﮕﺸﺖ . ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﮑﺘﺐ ﺛﻘﻠﯿﻦ )ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﯿﺖ( ﻧﯿﺰ ﺣﻞّ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ . -2 ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﯿﺰﯾﮏ ﺫﺭّﻩ ﺍﯼ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ »ﺭﯾﺴﻤﺎﻧﯽ« ﺍﺻﻮﻟﯽ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﮑﺘﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ. -3 ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ »ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﮏ « ﺗﻮﺿﯿﺢ ﺟﺎﻟﺒﯽ ﺍﺯ ﻣﮑﺘﺐ ﻣﺬﮐﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ . -4 ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺣﯿﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﯾﮕﺮ. -5 ﯾﮑﯽ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺑﺲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﯾﮑﺮ ﻧﯿﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺗﮑﻤﯿﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺁﻗﺎﯼ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﺍ ﮐﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﯾﺪ، ﭼﯿﺰﯼ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻧﮑﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﯾﺪ ﯾﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﯾﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﯾﺪ، ﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺀﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﮐﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﯿﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ؟ - ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺮ ﭼﺎﭘﯽ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﮑﺘﺮﻭﻧﯿﮑﯽ ﺁﻥ، ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﮐﺮﺩ. ﺩﯾﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﯿﺖ) ﻉ ( ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﯿﺎﺭ ﺩﻧﯿﺎ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻡ ﮐﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﯼ ﺑﻪ ﯾﻐﻤﺎ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ ﻣﮕﺮ ﭘﯿﺸﺎﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﮐﺰ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺷﺨﺼﺎً ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﮐﺘﺒﯽ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻧﻤﺎﯾﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﮑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﯾﻐﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﯿﺖ ) ﻉ( ﺩﺭ ﻣﯿﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ. ﺑﺒﯿﻨﯿﺪ ﺧﯿﻠﯽ ﺟﺎﯼ ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ : ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﯽ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﺜﻼً ﻣﯽ ﮔﻮﯾﻨﺪ » ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﮐﻨﻮﻧﯽ ﺯﺍﺋﯿﺪﻩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭘﯿﺸﯿﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ «، ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﯿﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ »ﺁﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭘﯿﺸﯿﻦ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺠﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ « ﭼﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﯽ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟ ﺍﯾﻨﺎﻥ ﻫﯿﭻ ﺭﺍﻫﯽ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻣﮕﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻝ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﯼ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ »ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ « ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﻠﮏ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﻫﻤﯿﺸﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﯼ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ . ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﭘﯿﺶ ﻣﯽ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻭﺭﻗﯽ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 57 ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﯿﻨﯽ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﻡ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﮐﺸﻔﯿﺎﺕ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺸﺖ . ﺑﻠﯽ ﺩﯾﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﯽ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﯿﺖ )ﻉ ( ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﯾﻐﻤﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﭙﺎﺭﻡ . ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﮑﺮ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺎﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﮕﻮﯼ ﮐﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺷﺮﮐﺖ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﯾﺪ. ............................................. ...................................... ﭘﯿﻮﺳﺖ ﻫﺎ: -1 ﺳﻨﺪ ﺭﺳﯿﺪ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ -2 ﺳﻨﺪ ﺭﺳﯿﺪ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎﻡ -3 ﺳﻨﺪ ﺭﺳﯿﺪ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﺮﻧﻞ -4 ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﯿﺴﯽ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﯽ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻣﺬﮐﻮﺭ ______________________________ __________ MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS Faculty of Industrial Safety & Occupational Health Explanation of the universe and Human A Summary of the contents of this book. In the chapter dealing with theism , the following Issues are presented. 1-Adavent of time and place and their definitions. 2- Universe, time and place were non-existeant before and Are phenomena In universological chapters 1 and 2, the following issues are discussed . 1-Explanation and elucidation of how the universe was created 2- the age of the universe fro its advents until tobay 218700000000 years in terms of time known to man . 3- The oldest sun in existence can be 12500000000 years Old . 4- 12500000000 years age there were less galaxies and heavenly systems and bodies than there are today , there were onlh masses of gases , molten matter and energy . 5- The universe underwent general developments and is believed to be " big bangs" six times since its advent ( with all of the galaxies destroyed ) ; the new galaxies have appeared . 6- the period between each two of these so- called big bangs is measured at 18250000000 years. In the chapter on anthropology -1 the follow subjects are debated. 1-Stages of the formation of the earh 2-Stages of the appearance and development of foodst- Uffs. 3-Intrinsic distinction between the race of man who now lives on earth and those who inhbited this planet in past ages. 4-Transformism and fixism regarding the creation of flora and fauna as well as all human races; no matter whether some of them are extinct; Islam believes In transformism and stipulates a "special trend" for todays man. 5-Appearance of other micro- organisms from which humans of the past and present originated. 6-The human, in his present form, has undergone vegetational and crustaceal and crustaceal evolutionary stages . In Anthropology chapter 2 , the origin of family , society , decemcy , joy , grief , law and costumes in Islam has been clearly expounded . Vali-Asr Ave.Hotel Esteglal St. Tehran – Iran -5 ﻣﺘﻦ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﯽ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺁﻣﯿﺰ ﺁﯾﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ______________________________ __________ ﺑﻨﺎﻡ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺭﯾﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﻋﺎﻟﯽ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻫﻤﮑﺎﺭﺍﻧﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﮐﺰ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﻭ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﯼ ﻧﺸﺎﻁ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻓﯿﻖ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻧﺪﺭ ﮐﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺸﻒ ﻣﺠﻬﻮﻻﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﻞ، ﮔﻼﯾﻪ ﺯﯾﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﻣﯽ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻢ: ﺭﻭﺯ ﯾﮑﺸﻨﺒﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ -1376 ﺑﯿﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻓﻮﺭﯾﻪ 1998 ﻣﯿﻼﺩﯼ - ﮐﺎﻧﺎﻟﻬﺎﯼ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺗﻠﻮﯾﺰﯾﻮﻥ ﮐﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﯼ ﻭ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﯼ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ، ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﯼ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ 23 ﻓﻮﺭﯾﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺯﯾﺮ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺨﺶ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻋﯿﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﮐﭙﯽ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺬﮐﻮﺭ، ﺩﺭ ﺯﯾﺮ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﯽ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﺋﯿﺪ : ﺍﮐﻨﻮﻥ ﯾﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ: ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﯿﺶ ﺩﻭ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ « ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﮐﻪ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭﯾﺎﻓﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻃﯽ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﯾﺪ ﮐﻪ ﮐﭙﯽ ﺁﻥ ﺿﻤﯿﻤﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ. ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﺋﯿﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﯿﺪ ﺩﯾﺪ ﮐﻪ »ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺟﺪﯾﺪ « ﯼ ﮐﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ »ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻭﮐﯿﻨﮓ « ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﯼ »ﻧﯿﻞ ﺗﻮﺭﻭﮎ« ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﮑﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻤﺎ، ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﮑﺎﺭﯼ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺫﮐﺮ ﻧﺎﻣﯽ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻄﻮﺭﯼ ﮐﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺷﻨﻮﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﯼ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺍﺑﺘﮑﺎﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﯾﻨﮑﻪ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﻋﯿﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮐﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﺸﮑﺮﻡ ﺣﺘﯽ ﻟﻔﻆ »ﻧﺨﻮﺩ « ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 35 ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﯿﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺤﺚ »ﺯﻣﺎﻥ « ﻭ »ﻣﮑﺎﻥ « ﺑﺤﺚ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻧﯿﺰ ﮔﺴﺘﺮ ﺵ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ »ﺍﺑﺪﯼ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻗﺎﺕ « ﻭ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 12 ﻣﯿﻠﯿﺎﺭﺩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺍﯾﻨﮑﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﯼ »ﺑﯿﮓ ﺑﻨﮓ« ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ ﻋﻈﯿﻢ« ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﯼ ﺟﺎﯼ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ ﮐﻨﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ، ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﺑﯿﻨﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ، ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﯽ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ. ﺑﺪﯾﻬﯽ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﮐﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﮑﺎﺭﯼ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ » ﻣﺆﺳﺴﻪ ﻓﻦ ﺁﻭﺭﯼ ﮐﺎﻟﯿﻔﺮﻧﯿﺎ« ﺑﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﺡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﯿﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﯿﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ، ﻻﺑﺪ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﯾﮕﺮ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺟﺪﯾﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﺿﯿﺢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﯾﮏ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﯼ ﮐﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ. ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺭﯾﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﯾﻨﺪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﻭ ﮐﺘﺎﺑﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪ ﻣﺬﮐﻮﺭ ﺻﺮﯾﺤﺎً ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺸﻤﻨﺪﻡ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﺍﯼ ﺍﺯ ﺑﯿﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﯾﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﺩﺭﺱ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﯼ ﮐﻪ ﻗﺒﻼً ﻟﻄﻒ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﯾﺪ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ . ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﮐﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ، ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻬﺎﯼ ﺳﺎﯾﺮ ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﯿﺰ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ، ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﺮﻧﻞ ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ، ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺮ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻧﯿﺰ - ﮐﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ - ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﯽ ﺑﻪ ﭘﯿﻮﺳﺖ ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮﺩ . ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺯﯾﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ : -1 ﺗﻮﺿﯿﺢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﮐﻪ ﺁﻥ )) ﻧﺨﻮﺩ(( ﺍﺯ ﮐﺠﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ. -2 ﯾﮏ ﻧﺨﻮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﺟﺴﻤﯽ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺲ ﮐﻮﭼﮏ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﯼ ﻣﯿﻠﯿﻮﻧﻬﺎ ﮐﻬﮑﺸﺎﻥ، ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ . ﺍﯾﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﯼ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺠﺎ ﺩﺭﯾﺎﻓﺖ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ؟ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺠﺎ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﭼﯿﺰﯼ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﮐﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻓﺮﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺿﯿﺢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﯾﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭ ﻣﯽ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻢ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﯾﮏ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﯽ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﮑﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺧﺮﯾﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﮐﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﮑﻤﯿﻞ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻡ. ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩ، ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺰﻭﻩ ﻫﺎﯼ ﺩﺭﺳﯽ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 1358 ﺗﺎ -1371 1979 ﺗﺎ -1992 ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﮐﺰ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﯾﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﺪﻩ ))ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻡ (( ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﯿﺪ ﮐﻪ ﮐﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻘﯽ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ ﻭ ﻃﺎﻗﺖ ﻓﺮﺳﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ. 18 ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﺍﯾﻦ ﮐﺘﺎﺏ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺷﺪﻩ، ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﯼ ﻭ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺁﺳﺎﯾﺶ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﮐﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺖ ﺍ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮐﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﻢ. ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻖ ﻣﯽ ﺩﻫﯿﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﻋﺎﻟﯽ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ . ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍً ﺁﺭﺯﻭﯼ ﺗﻮﻓﯿﻖ ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﮑﺎﺭﺍﻧﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﺯﯾﻦ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ، ﻣﯽ ﻧﻤﺎﯾﻢ . ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ -6 ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﯿﺴﯽ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺁﻣﯿﺰ ﺁﯾﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ ﺭﺿﻮﯼ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮐﻤﺒﺮﯾﺞ ______________________________ __________ IN THE NAME OF GOD 28/02/1998 The Honorable President Cambridge University ,His Excellency After conveying my heartfelt greetings and highest regards to your excellency as well as to your honourable colleagues in that well known scientific center and upon wishing further success and prosperity for the honourable authorities of that university in discovering the unknown scientific subjects and challenging whit ignorance, I would like to bring to your excellency attention the following complaint: On sunday 22/02/1998, following news was broadcasted and published in different channels of iranian television in news programs as well as in scientific and cultural programs and also in some Iranian presses including the Islamic Republic Newspaper on 23/02/1998, the copy of the mentioned newspaper is as follows: It should be mentuned that I sent Two copies of my book under the title of “Tabyine Jahan Va Insan” to your university approximately four years ago, and your excellency acknowledged the receipt through a litter, which its copy is attached herewith. If your excellency pay attention you will notice that the theory which has been advised by Mr. Stephan Hawking and Mr. Nil Torouk, is my innovated theory which has been declared without mentioning my name in such a way that readers think that the said important and scientific theory belong to them. Of course I am very pleased that they have written the exact terms which I have mentioned in my book. Even the term of “pea” (In persian Nokhoud) is indicated on page 35 of my book as well as “proportionality” which is mentioned at the beginning of the book and subjects of “time” and “place” have been discussed in that book. Also unlimited development of universe and eternity of creatures, the term of “The12 billion years” have been explained in that book. Their action in using the term “Huge Explosion” instead of “Big Bang” prevents me to be pessimistic on the said scientists. As they have advised , it has been arranged that the said innoveted theory to be discussed in detail with other scientists in “Technology Institute of California” next month. They may explain the other two main principles of this new theory from my book in order to be able to present a perfect theory. In view of the foregoing, I expect from your excellency to arrange that they mention the name of the resource and the book in which they have studied this theory as well as declaring my name clearly in the mentioned meeting program. It will be your excellencys great kindness if you could arrange so that a copy of their statements to be sent to me through the address which you had sent the previous letter. I also sent the same book to some other universities in other countries including “Durham university” and “Cornel university” of the USA and they have aknowledged the receipt and copies of their receipts are attached herewith for your excellencys information. My intention on the said two principles is as follows: 1- They shall explain how the pea have been created. They shall explain that how this pea has come to an existance. 2- A pea which is a very small material, so how it has been developed to be a large universe whit millions of galaxies. The pea, from where has received the existing enormous materials and energy. From where it has eaten and has become so fat. It is obvious that responding to my questions and explanations about the two mentioned principles will be based on my book. It should be noted that this important scientific subject has been a subject of discussion in my family during the past four generations and I, as the last member of the family have completed it. Although it was published as a book five years ago, but the related study papers (Pamphlets) of the said subject were distributed by my students in different universities of iran from 1979 to 1992 as I have mentioned in introduction of my book. As your excellency know, scientific research is a hard work and I worked on my book for 18 years and I spent all of my times and deprived myself from all kinds of rest and convenience in order to complete my research. So I think your excellency would accept that I have a right to be concerned about this matter. Your excellencys sincere kindness will be highly appreciated. Yours Faithfully, Morteza Razavi binesheno/piwik/ piwik.php?idsite ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷﻨﺒﻪ، ﺩﺭ 16:
Posted on: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:45:07 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015